The commenter argues that safety and evidence about living systems should take priority over expansion of…

The commenter argues that safety and evidence about living systems should take priority over expansion of wireless exposure.

• Exposure limits & oversight: “Safety needs to outweigh the growth of this exposure.”
• Environmental effects: “creasing at an alarming rate without serious consideration of the science showing evidence how harmful EMFs, RF and wireless radiation exposure is to living beings and the planet.”

Matched review of original text; attachments excluded. Review provenance