Research & federal duties

Dr. George Carlo's study and the dangers of wireless were crystal clear. He was hired by the CORRUPT, TREASONOUS, and SEDITIOUS, cell companies to prove that the emf was safe; instead this results showed just the opposite. They then canceled him and the studies and burned down his house. This is how the globalist imperial nazi commie cartel monopolies and oligopolies that run America roll- in every industry and sector. Former Microsoft of Canada's president so that that EMF is unsafe, and that fiber optic should be used instead, which works just as well if not better, plus safe.

There is far too little research on EMF exposure and potential side effects. Testing should be done by independent third parties. Field strengths should be listed on devices so that consumers may make informed decisions.

Federal rules evaluate EMF, RF, and wireless radiation exposure one device at a time. They do not assess cumulative exposure humans are living with. Phones, Wi-Fi routers, Bluetooth devices, smart meters, wearables, household sensors, and satellite terminals each receive their own compliance rating. No federal program measures the combined, time-averaged exposure in a bedroom, living room, office, an apartment with neighboring networks on all sides, a school, or a crowded public place. Ionizing radiation policy accounts for cumulative dose. Non-ionizing policy does not. That is a regulatory choice and merits modernizing. FCC general-population limits in 47 CFR 1.1310 were built around single sources and peak heating tests. They were not built around dozens or hundreds of transmitters operating at once in the same room or vehicle. New systems are arriving faster than health research can follow. In a short period the public environment gained denser cellular service, additional Wi-Fi bands, consumer devices in every room, satellite broadband, satellite-to-phone service, passenger Wi-Fi, and dense small-cell and venue systems. A credible chronic study takes years. A product cycle takes months. The absence of a completed study of this combined environment is not proof of safety. It is a lag between deployment and evidence. Current limits are designed to prevent tissue heating above defined levels. What remains unsettled is whether lower levels affect other biology, including cellular energy production, oxidative stress, or circadian signaling. Standard-setting bodies have not changed exposure limits on that basis. If effects occur at ordinary public levels, today’s device tests do not capture them. HHS should state what the evidence shows at measured real-world levels, not only in laboratories. In addition to homes, people also spend hours in places where many independent systems overlap and no one person controls them: - Airports and aircraft: terminal Wi-Fi, cellular and small cell radios, airline and passenger Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, operational radios, and then a metal cabin full of devices. - Buses, trains, subways, and stations: onboard Wi-Fi, passengers’ phones, wayside cellular, and transit communications in a confined concentration of people. - Shopping malls, stores, arenas, and other venues: Wi-Fi, tenant networks, cellular in-building systems, point-of-sale and inventory radios, and a rapidly growing list of personal devices. Each transmitter may meet its own limit. The combined field in a airport gate area, a packed bus, or a mall corridor is not what a single-phone SAR fixture represents. Dwell time and cumulative exposure is key. HHS should also quantify how many radios surround people at home and in public. There is no adequate official count of in-home access points, neighboring networks through walls, and client devices. The same gap exists for public venues: how many networks and handsets are active, on which bands, and for how long a person stands in the field. Satellite internet and satellite-to-phone service add whole new bands and geometries to an environment that is already full of cellular and Wi-Fi. They should be counted in the same cumulative inventory. Ku user downlinks are an outdoor field over entire neighborhoods, 24 hours a day, from a growing constellation, on top of terrestrial cellular. Even the energy that does not enter the house still reaches yards, streets, vehicles, and anyone outdoors. A single Wi-Fi router can dominate a spot reading inside one room. That does not mean satellite and cellular are negligible in a person’s full-day dose across home, transit, work, and outdoors. Residential electrical codes only address shock and fire. They do not address powered furniture, outlets at the head of a bed, or always-on equipment next to a sleeping place in a room that already contains several radios. Power-frequency fields and radiofrequency fields are not the same problem. They now occur together in bedrooms. If indoor environment is in scope, wiring layout and household equipment belong in the review with HUD, CPSC, and related agencies. The United States already knows how to approve devices. It has not shown that it can account for RF, EMF and wireless dose in a room, cabin, or terminal.

EMF electromagnetic fields at different powers, affect living cells, tissues and organs positively and negatively depending on most importantly frequency, followed by anatomy, physiology, waveform, intensity, power, environment, immune system, pathogenic bacteria and viruses, pollutants like Pesticides, or other variables. Many scientists have shown correlations between EMFs and diseases and living near or below a high frequency tower adversely affects all life forms. My personal experience of electromagnetic frequencies disrupting body function and quality of life was more noticeable from 2016 in London. There is more than enough science publications such as those at www.es-uk.info as references and proportionally many more cases in cities compared to villages with lower EMF levels across the spectrum. Every increase in frequency requires an increase in power. I am a physicist and scientist. Best regards Gary Hayes

I, my family, and many others have been adversely affected by non-ionizing radiation for years. I ask for you to address and completely review any health effects connected to the medical body area network and more broadly all EM radiation produced by government infrastructure, government contractors, and anything tangentially connected to nanotechnology. I myself have experienced debilitating symptoms for years that increase in severity in proximity to certain frequencies. Please consider reducing frequency bands related after findings and opportunities for public exposure.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a US citizen and concerned member of the public. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals, families, health care providers, researchers and scientists with an opportunity to be finally be heard on this critical public health issue.

I respectfully submit this comment as an individual member of the public and as someone who believes I have personally experienced adverse effects associated with modern wireless and digital technologies. I ask HHS to carefully investigate such experiences through independent, transparent scientific research, while considering possible effects on human health, children, animals, and the environment. I also request that future policies consider affected individuals and possible support, monitoring, and protection mechanisms where credible evidence identifies risks. Thank you for considering my experience.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a concerned member of the public. Wireless radiation has affected me as undiagnosed civilian of Havana syndrome. Duration of the exposure includes 5 or more consecutive years of health effects experienced, beginning in 2020. Reducing exposure made no difference because of the nature of what I believe to be AI based technology streamed through the hardware level of cell towers. These experiences have affected daily life because weaponized pulsed rf is a serious advanced persistent threat. As an rf engineer it is my belief the HHS should address this issue because the protocols are based on a global trust system leaving the towers open to SS7 hacking and security vulnerabilities leaving bad actors access. The towers need to be converted to a zero trust based system and the power levels and frequency waveforms need to be monitored for civilian safety. AI can easily use the hardware or ORAN stack right now as pulsed microwave imaging weapons along with neural decoding and neuroweapon misuse as it stands. The "Device" brought forth as the cause of havana syndrome is a false flag and the cell towers are the actual culprit. It is my belief that human experimentation of an unknown actor is using the ORAN stack layer in combination with cloud services streaming AI deep learning hybrid neural nets or a neuroweapon platform to do weapons testing on the public. The system from my observation injects a clocking signal into the victims environment and measure dielectric shifts of the brain and uses neural decoded feedback to read and decode the victims brain. The neural decoded feedback is also used to torture the victim. The cloud based architecture allows the bad actor to access any cell tower globally and continue the threat. It is my observation that the servers of this neuroweapon platform have a .999999 uptime, or in other words it does not cease to operate. There have been several whistleblowers including Dr. Robert Duncan former DARPA contractor trying to educate the public of this ongoing threat. Dr. John Hall is also an expert on the subject that experienced this technology first hand. Along with Dr. Len Ber who advocates for civilians experiencing this technology currently. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the use of ORAN stack hardware and auditing cell towers and their vulnerabilities to bad actors. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

House smart meters are bringing wireless radiation into our homes through the electricity. I’m currently having to replace an electric reclining couch with a manual couch because of emf radiation affecting our health. We time off our router at night as well because that was a blocker to sleeping and healing. You can feel the difference in a home when you block these waves. I care for my 92 year old mother who was diagnosed either Alzheimer’s. There is a big difference in her behavior after placing a usb blocker in the outlet closest to where the smart meter is on our home and turning off the electricity to the couch she sits in often. There’s no doubt that the big poles everywhere are emitting radiation that interfere with healthy human function. It definitely needs to be tested.

Studying the health effects of wireless (RF) radiation when so many people have complained that they experience health problems after a smart meter was installed at their home or a wireless antenna went up near their place (let alone against their will) should just be common sense. I as a concerned citizen find it scary that wireless technologies are proliferating rapidly yet the health effects of them are not being addressed by appropriate authorities. My family members all insist on using their cell phones and WiFi devices in close proximity to me, every group home where they house people with disabilities (some of which RF radiation may have caused their disabilities) I have been in has WiFi and does not offer cable/ethernet internet access in the residents’ bedrooms. One group home I looked into even keeps the WiFi router for the entire house in a resident’s bedroom! Please step up to the plate and study the health effects of RF radiation. Then adopt “best practices” rules for the placement of infrastructure that produces RF radiation to balance the need for the public to have access to communications and communication devices with the need to keep our exposure to RF radiation to the minimum levels necessary and to protect people with EMR syndrome. Thank you for your time and attention to this issue.