The commenter argues for informed consent and opt-in exposure arrangements, placing responsibility for de…

Choice. The mental anguish of not having a choice whether or not to be exposed & subjected to this invisible assault is criminal. We don't know what we don't know so thank you for attempting to find out. Society driven by all things electronic run by a small group of madmen in a quest for the final billion dollar frontier is not healthy. All of it under the guise of convenience. We think we are making a choice to participate or not to participate when in fact the choice is actually being made for the people without actual consent. "It's just the way we do it now" is not a choice. This growing, untested, unregulated human made frequency was never voted on by the people as a policy & procedure acceptable for it's use. We are all guinea pigs once again in a grand experiment that seems to have no end in measure of exposure. Hence why the expedient build out of data centers. I opt out every chance I get with "standard procedures" that rely on radiation, in my home, at the airport, at the dentist, etc. Again, the burden is on opting out when the choice should exist to opt in. The burden of safety needs to be the starting point & not shifted to the burden of proof of injury after the fact. Many thanks for your awareness, every effort to course correct for humanity, & being a voice for all who are ignored & can't break through the noise of a scripted bought & paid for narrative.