{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6396","body_sha256":"16e37240572f0b4e0fa49ae607d7a66fc2174d75202dd3ceafff8c325f3e976f","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":" when the choice should exist to opt in. The burden of safety needs to be the starting point & not shifted to the burden of pr"},{"id":"other","evidence":"lly being made for the people without actual consent. \"It's just the way we do it now\" is not a choice. This growing,"}],"summary":"The commenter argues for informed consent and opt-in exposure arrangements, placing responsibility for demonstrating safety on technology providers.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T23:54:32Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"7372010e7e3b2af2702c75714838f8671d37e1d48a3cd481bf78011d22ab1a6b","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}