The commenter questions the inquiry's purpose, alleges military and atmospheric uses of electromagnetic t…

What is the true intent behind this inquiry? Is the goal simply to find out whether—and in what way—one’s own creditors have already perceived this technology as a threat, or is it merely to be able to claim afterward that one has always taken this issue seriously? No (military) technology has been researched more extensively over the past hundred years than this one. None has ever been deployed so successfully or decided the outcome of wars. None can be concealed so effectively (as a false flag) and, moreover, offers such a wide range of diverse (invisible) mechanisms of action that extend far beyond the potential biological risks to humans. Judging by the countless patents and based solely on the existing research and medical information that has been released to the public so far, EMF technology is and remains, without a doubt, the jack-of-all-trades for those who strive for power and control. Have we already forgotten Chernobyl and the Duga, for example? Or that, diagnostically speaking, flu symptoms are virtually indistinguishable from the symptoms of EMF exposure? Dead exosomes are merely the result of cellular damage and cannot possibly be the root cause or even evidence of anything, not even if you put a "crown" on it. So, do we all get an infection every year, or are we simply being exposed to a little more EM-radiation? Maybe we should start by addressing that? What about indirect factors (caused by EMFs); factors that, for example, negatively impact our living conditions and thereby harm humans? People are wondering why landscapes are either drying up or being flooded? Or why a global temperature change—which is minuscule when viewed in the context of Earth’s overall evolution—should directly cause the entire weather system to go haywire; in a natural system that strives for balance, where “differences” are immediately counterbalanced? How could such extremes even develop naturally? Or why do clouds suddenly start to visibly display “Doppler signatures” everywhere? Where else could these come from, if not from the thousands upon thousands of Doppler systems that are supposedly essential for weather forecasting—systems that, unfortunately, haven’t improved one millimeter despite quadrillions in investments over the past 50 years? Why is there a patent for “hurricanes caused by EMFs” if no one would ever use it? Why, in fact, are there no known hurricanes from the time before EMFs? And weren’t chemtrails even developed specifically to compensate for evaporation effects caused by increased atmospheric energy density—because otherwise it probably wouldn’t rain at all in some places anymore? This brings us to the next point. The effects of exposure to electromagnetic frequencies depend on far more than just power output; the problem is that there are no limit values at all for the other criteria. No one takes biological frequency ranges (such as those of the brain) into account, and this really raises the question: Why—on purpose?! ... A 70-hertz wave, for example, can cause disorientation, since the brain uses precisely this frequency range to coordinate perception. This is primarily due to the fact that the ELF frequencies used by the military are also pulsed, at approximately 7–8 hertz ! Just kidding? No! ...but who do we tell that to... And what are those who are actually responsible for protection doing? The »terribly independent« Commission (of the ICNIRP) consistently denies and ignores any form of athermal symptoms associated with radiation exposure. Its recommended exposure limits are set so high that we’re just barely avoiding getting burned (like a rotisserie chicken)! The failure to account for non-thermal symptoms creates a legal vacuum for all kinds of harm caused by EMFs before or without burns even occurring! Why? Furthermore, the extremely high power peaks in pulsed signals are not taken into account in any limit values; instead, the argument is based on the average power of continuous-wave signals. Why? 99% of the output power of EMF signals is absorbed as heat. ...and the world wonders why temperatures are rising. Spot the mistake. We could go on like this for hours, but that’s not necessary to understand the pattern behind it. In any case, this inquiry should be expanded to include the far more compelling question: Who will be held liable for the unimaginable consequences resulting from the use and (government) abuse of this technology?! The truth will always prevail, and when it does, the time will come for those who will be held accountable. Amen. Your Creditors