{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6258","body_sha256":"1552107a74f9ac3a64a3db3acaddbcf9c9ea02992e47e199be87ade6135fc94a","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"directed","topics":[{"id":"directed","evidence":" has always taken this issue seriously?\n\nNo (military) technology has been researched more extensively over the past h"},{"id":"geoengineering","evidence":"canes from the time before EMFs? And weren’t chemtrails even developed specifically to compensate for evaporation effect"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"ted with radiation exposure. Its recommended exposure limits are set so high that we’re just barely avoiding getting burned ("},{"id":"mechanisms","evidence":"at all for the other criteria.\n\nNo one takes biological frequency ranges (such as those of the brain) into account, and this really raise"}],"summary":"The commenter questions the inquiry's purpose, alleges military and atmospheric uses of electromagnetic technology, criticizes thermal-only and averaged limits, and calls for accountability.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T23:54:32Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"b934b4680506664f4f958845f0f9c8080eaba9556fd4a3336b256b1f4d721192","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}