AI summary & topic connections
Objects to an adjacent tower installed without consultation, reports a spouse’s cancer and neighbors’ health problems, and describes difficulty identifying the operator or obtaining recourse.
- Towers & siting: “A cell tower appeared on an adjacent unoccupied property about 500yds from my house and 400yds from my neighbor ”
- Cancer & tumors: “ce and he told me he didnt care because he was not affected. My husband now has cancer and our elderly neighbors suffer from multiple health issues known to be related to EMF. Because it”
- Exposure limits & oversight: “ 400yds from my neighbor just N of me in Jackson County, OK. Neither of us were notified or asked if it would be ok.The property owner is paid for it to be on his land. He has a big house ”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
A cell tower appeared on an adjacent unoccupied property about 500yds from my house and 400yds from my neighbor just N of me in Jackson County, OK. Neither of us were notified or asked if it would be ok.The property owner is paid for it to be on his land. He has a big house somewhere else. I expressed my concerns to him face to face and he told me he didnt care because he was not affected. My husband now has cancer and our elderly neighbors suffer from multiple health issues known to be related to EMF. Because it is on private land we have little recourse. We cannot even find out who actually owns this tower. We are being harmed against our will.
Community corner
Community discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.