AI summary & topic connections
Argues that exposure limits are too high and requests research into neurological effects of 5G and LED lighting, including occupational and insect concerns.
- Exposure limits & oversight: “d out if we are to set a more realistic Safe level of exposure for the general public and all those who work n”
- Research & federal duties: “s is mostly absent. A great deal more research into the neurological and neurophysiological response to th”
- Neurological symptoms & sleep: “. A great deal more research into the neurological and neurophysiological response to these EMF sources should”
- Environmental effects: “tal consequence of LED lighting is that insect reproduction near these lights is mostly absent. A great deal more res”
- Occupational exposure: “or the general public and all those who work near EMF sources.”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I studied biology to degree level, graduating in 1994. The subject of cell science was a favourite of mine.
My comment arises from the fact that there is evidence that the current, Safe E/M Radiation Level is much too high, current levels causing changes in biological cellular activity.
5G masts are of concern in the UK, and LED street lighting is a further issue. While you can put up heavy curtains to dim the light, the radiation is of course unimpeded.
Furthermore, one environmental consequence of LED lighting is that insect reproduction near these lights is mostly absent.
A great deal more research into the neurological and neurophysiological response to these EMF sources should be carried out if we are to set a more realistic Safe level of exposure for the general public and all those who work near EMF sources.
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.