I experience body inflammation and agitation from EMF. It has gotten worse since fiber optic cable was installed in my neighborhood last spring. Research indicates that it is the subatomic particles leaking through the fiber optic cable and traveling through wires like cable service wires into a house. These subatomic particles are shown to be more damaging to human cells than EMF or any cell tower radiation. This needs to be investigated. People are feeling the ill effects from this and they don't realize what is causing it.
High power lines were brought in by various leaders and ultimately by eminent domain rule. As Marshall Township members (Michigan) were fighting this, Matt Davis (playing on a Marshall Board) told property owners to “take one for the team”.
Fast forward and high power lines cut through various properties and run parallel for a section of 15 1/2 Mile road.
With varied heart issues, I was blindsided when taking a run on the path I had for over 15 years. I did not realize at first what was happening. I was 3/4 of a mile into my run which normally has me in my groove. Something was wrong. It happened fast and I was in the road, a dead stop on my hands and knees, glad no vehicles were present. I could hardly catch my breath and took a minute feeling paralyzed then forced myself to push through. It took some time and I found my groove again. After mile two, I turned to head back home. All of a sudden, the tight chest and symptoms were back. Puzzled briefly, I quickly put it together. I turned around, ran out of it and resumed normal.
It was the high power lines. Running parallel was debilitating and I cut through a farmers field to get home. No more running that path.
Thank you for doing this research.
We so need better awareness and protection.
2. In your response, please describe which perspective(s) your comments represent:
I am an individual consumer & patient
3. a. The type(s) of wireless technology or RF/EMF : I use mobile smartphone & wearable devices (Smart watch & Ear buds)
b. The nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing of the reported
exposure(s): 2021-2025
c. The potential adverse health effects experienced. A.) Smartphone problems: 1.) when held to my ear it increases my tinnitus so I cannot hear the person speaking on the phone. 2.) When looking at the screen the display must be set at Natural with Eye Comfort set at very warm tones and I still get headaches and blurry eyes from looking at the screen. I must constantly look away from the screen. B.) Smart Watch problems: When wearing it, I feel pain in the entire area of where the watch is on me. I tried changing the arm I wore it on and I had the same pain. C.) Ear buds: When in my ears it makes my ears hurt. If I must wear them, I wear only one at a time because I feel the pain and get a migraine eventually. It also increases my tinnitus issues.
d. When potential adverse health effects first appeared relative to when exposure
began and whether any changes in exposure coincided with potential adverse
health effects. A.) Smartphone: Happens every time I look at my phone for more than 30 seconds. B.) Smart Watch: Within 5 minutes of wear pain begins. C.) Ear buds: Within about 1 minute of wearing the pain starts with one or both, and then the becomes unbearable in about 15-30 minutes of use in the ear it is located in. I found if using only 1 at a time I can switch ears and use for no more than 1 hour or I do get a migraine.
e. I have mentioned to Dr's however, their answer is the same, then do not wear or use them anymore. A.) Smartphone: Migraines, ear aches, tinnitus, & blurry eyes. B.) Smart Watch: bone pain in hand and wrist where it is worn on. C.) Ear buds: Migraines, tinnitus & ear aches.
f. Whether steps to reduce or eliminate exposure were taken and, if so, whether any
subsequent changes in potential adverse health effects were observed. A.) Smartphone: I try to use speakerphone most of the time. I cannot sleep with it anywhere near me while I sleep. B.) Smart Watch: I would switch wrists and attempted timing how long it was worn and how long i could handle the pain and did not last more than an hour before taking it off. C.) Earbuds: I use only one at a time when necessary to reduce the amount of pain because it is significantly worse if ear buds are in both ears at the same time. I also know if I use too long I will have a migraine.
If I had known of the risk of pain, tinnitus, ear aches, eye pain, etc I would not have wasted $800 on the smart watch. It was very upsetting to discover how negatively it would impact me and waste my money and not be able to return it.
I want a smartphone with less EMF and protections against the radiation so I can use without harming my eyes, brain, and ears.
If I do not use the screen or smartphone at all my sight stops being so blurry and returns to normal. Where is our freedom of choice...the only Smartphones out there all have too much EMF making us sick. We need to have a choice for a simpler phone with next to NO radiation.
I noticed comments are open about electromagnetic frequencies. I am one who is sensitive to EMF's and try to limit my time around them, although is impossible to do so as they are everywhere. am sending this link...https://ehsciences.org/data-centers-increase-electromagnetic-fields-emf-exposure/.... this is a great article by Environmental Health Sciences about EMF's and radiation... we the people should not be subjected to EMF's... we should have an option to not be close to hyperscale data centers or other types of radiation... thank you for reading my comment... Rhonda Brackett
Public Comment to the Federal Communications Commission - I am Kim Konte, founder of Non-Toxic Neighborhoods, a national nonprofit working to protect children from environmental harm where they live, learn, and play.
Children are not little adults. Their nervous systems are developing, and they face years of exposure to wireless technology: 4G and 5G networks in their communities, devices in their hands, and Wi‑Fi routers mounted overhead in many classrooms. The country is already planning for 6G, while the FCC continues to rely on radiofrequency exposure limits adopted in 1996.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans. That classification does not prove that classroom Wi‑Fi causes cancer. It does mean the FCC should take unanswered questions seriously, reduce unnecessary exposure to children, and require independent research focused on their health. Children’s clinicians and independent scientists must have a meaningful voice in setting safety policy.
An experimental study reported impaired insulin secretion and increased oxidative stress in the pancreatic cells of rats exposed to Wi‑Fi frequency radiation. It does not establish that Wi‑Fi causes type 2 diabetes in children. It raises a question the FCC should investigate: could long-term exposure affect children’s metabolic health?
At a 2019 Senate hearing, Senator Richard Blumenthal asked wireless industry representatives to identify independent research on the biological effects of 5G. They said they were unaware of such studies. He concluded: “We’re kind of flying blind here, as far as health and safety is concerned.”
The National Toxicology Program’s 2018 animal studies found “some evidence” of cancer in male rats exposed to 2G and 3G cell-phone signals. Those studies did not test 5G or the combination of wireless exposures children experience today. A federal appeals court later found that the FCC had failed to adequately explain its decision to retain its exposure limits, including its response to evidence about children and long-term exposure.
The FCC must answer the court, require independent research focused on children, and stop treating wireless access as the only way to connect a classroom. Schools should use hardwired internet as the default and limit wireless exposure wherever practical. Children’s health must come before the next wireless rollout.
These things being weaponized by government, fusion centers to silence people, whistleblowers yet fcc or any agency does not investigate. Come to Buffalo, investigate.. the illegal weaponization of government.
The EMFs, RF, and Radiation wireless are being targeted to my body in my home. Also my electric BMW also have been targeted against my body. These sharp Electric Magnetic hit me every day in my house. At night I’m targeted in my head. I had began sleeping underneath my husband hospital bed. I slept/sleep with a football helmet on my head. They also sexually target me towards my genitalia. Drones flew over my house targeting me. I used flighttrader24 to identify the when I m getting hit.
I am a EHS sufferer for the past two and half years after having a smart meter enforced on me, I have suffered with severe rashes, burns , blistering which were so bad I was hospitalised for 5 days ,I have been diagnosed with severe tachycardia due to the meter attacking my metal and titanium implants, I have not been able to live in my home for over 2 years, this is a medical emergency for all suffering from the effects of this technology the corporation has received medical letters and exemptions but have refused to remove the meter whilst I am forced to sleep and stay in a car
