AI summary & topic connections
The commenter urges immediate protective action by HHS and FCC, favors fiber optics, criticizes siting preemption and longstanding standards, and questions reductions in federal research.
- Exposure limits & oversight: “nd HHS to immediately recognize the harm and protect the health and safety of Americans and the nation. Fiber optics is safer, faster and m”
- Li-Fi, fiber & alternatives: “alth and safety of Americans and the nation. Fiber optics is safer, faster and more secure. Why has the FCC allowed wireless freque”
- Section 704 / TCA: “ecognition of the harm? Why did the FCC pass laws in 1996 to disallow communities to stop the proliferation of cell phone towers based on health o”
- Towers & siting: “ in 1996 to disallow communities to stop the proliferation of cell phone towers based on health or environmental effects? Why hasn't the FCC upd”
- Research & federal duties: “ were flawed int he first place? Why has the funding for determining the effects of manmade frequencies been eliminated from the Environmental Pr”
- Environmental effects: “dio frequency microwave radiation on humans, animals and all biological life? Our government agencies have failed us and I request this issue”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Radio frequency radiation (microwave) and electromagnetic frequencies have insidiously proliferated in our environment and are causing debilitating health effects in all biological organisms, including humans. We do not need more studies (see attached). We need the FCC and HHS to immediately recognize the harm and protect the health and safety of Americans and the nation. Fiber optics is safer, faster and more secure. Why has the FCC allowed wireless frequencies to proliferate without recognition of the harm? Why did the FCC pass laws in 1996 to disallow communities to stop the proliferation of cell phone towers based on health or environmental effects? Why hasn't the FCC updated their 30 year old safety studies that were flawed int he first place? Why has the funding for determining the effects of manmade frequencies been eliminated from the Environmental Protection Agency? Why hasn't the HHS taken the necessary steps to determine the effects of radio frequency microwave radiation on humans, animals and all biological life? Our government agencies have failed us and I request this issue be regarded as a top priority.
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.