{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4392","body_sha256":"0a8782c946deb52a7b53ac4773526542b341bba9e617efbd3da8b27480df628d","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"nd HHS to immediately recognize the harm and protect the health and safety of Americans and the nation. Fiber optics is safer, faster and m"},{"id":"optical","evidence":"alth and safety of Americans and the nation. Fiber optics is safer, faster and more secure. Why has the FCC allowed wireless freque"},{"id":"section-704","evidence":"ecognition of the harm? Why did the FCC pass laws in 1996 to disallow communities to stop the proliferation of cell phone towers based on health o"},{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":" in 1996 to disallow communities to stop the proliferation of cell phone towers based on health or environmental effects? Why hasn't the FCC upd"},{"id":"research","evidence":" were flawed int he first place? Why has the funding for determining the effects of manmade frequencies been eliminated from the Environmental Pr"},{"id":"environment","evidence":"dio frequency microwave radiation on humans, animals and all biological life? Our government agencies have failed us and I request this issue"}],"summary":"The commenter urges immediate protective action by HHS and FCC, favors fiber optics, criticizes siting preemption and longstanding standards, and questions reductions in federal research.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-24T20:09:12Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"efb25e3b5ba3d9af600db8169480b1f25f02769e2690f866cc2c8c22efed88e6","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}