ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Comments of an Individual Commenter
Docket No. HHS-OASH-2026-0397, Request for Information on Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure and Health
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to this Request for Information. I am grateful that the Department has opened this question to public comment, and I submit the attached document as my full response.
The attachment answers the RFI's questions in order. A short summary at the start sets out the main points, and a consolidated list of recommendations near the end gathers every request I make, with a pointer to the paragraph where each is explained and the federal component I believe is best placed to act.
I have provided real facts about my life experience in this submission. Please handle them with care.
I have tried to make every factual statement in the attachment checkable. Each quotation is drawn from a source listed in the appendix, which identifies each document by its citation, docket or Federal Register reference. I distinguish peer-reviewed research from government records, credentialed testimony, personal accounts and advocacy material, and I state the limits of each where I rely on it. I have not cited AI-generated summaries as evidence. Where I could not verify something, I have said so rather than fill the gap.
I am not a scientist or a clinician, and I offer no scientific judgment of my own on whether these exposures cause harm. My recommendations on care, coverage and research are proposals for the Department's consideration, not findings.
I recognize that the Department will receive many comments on this subject, and I appreciate the time of the staff who review them. I hope the attached response is useful to that work, and I would welcome the Department's continued attention to the people whose care this question affects.
Respectfully submitted,
An individual commenter
Attachment: Full response to Docket No. HHS-OASH-2026-0397 (questions answered in RFI order; consolidated recommendations; appendix of sources)
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.