AI summary & topic connections
Argues that good data do not support adverse effects from routine exposure and warns that the inquiry could waste resources or lead to damaging regulations.
- Research & federal duties: “erse health effects is not supported by good data. Therefore, I think effort spent on this topic is at best a”
- Exposure limits & oversight: “rse will lead to ill-advised, damaging, regulations.”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I think the concept that routine exposure to these forms of electromagnetic radiation has adverse health effects is not supported by good data. Therefore, I think effort spent on this topic is at best a waste of time, and at worse will lead to ill-advised, damaging, regulations.
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.