{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-2502","number":"2502","name":"MICHAEL GILSON","organization":"","posted":"2026-10-13T04:00Z","received":"2026-10-10T04:00Z","body":"I think the concept that routine exposure to these forms of electromagnetic radiation has adverse health effects is not supported by good data. Therefore, I think effort spent on this topic is at best a waste of time, and at worse will lead to ill-advised, damaging, regulations.","attachments":[],"attachment_inventory":true,"withheld":false,"source":"https://www.regulations.gov/comment/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-2502","tags":["policy-standards"],"source_hash":"93a2b97efa98459f46fa96c6d5e3250c9ade637f0c20db2354665203dd54bca2","slug":"policy-standards-comment-2502","classification":{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-2502","body_sha256":"31bcee698dc1278a524e337f87adb7a844f108175e3efe8593d6eea5e1d104d4","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"erse health effects is not supported by good data. Therefore, I think effort spent on this topic is at best a"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"rse will lead to ill-advised, damaging, regulations."}],"summary":"Argues that good data do not support adverse effects from routine exposure and warns that the inquiry could waste resources or lead to damaging regulations.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-14T13:55:48Z","review_method":"Source-based AI review of complete published comment bodies; exact evidence passages; attachments and external links not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"00b8347ae4c4f8831c0d8ce5cc8cb99a73bbe6533c93176069850d82756c76d4","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"},"forum_topics":["research","standards"],"primary_topic":"research","forum_title":"Argues that good data do not support adverse effects from routine exposure and warns that the inquiry cou…"}