AI summary & topic connections
The commenter reports neurological episodes at low RF levels despite wired connections and avoiding wireless devices, and advocates substantially lower power-density limits.
- Neurological symptoms & sleep: “t I still have what neurologists describe as Aura's, Abscences and Drop attacks at a tiny fraction of what WiFi Routers emit: only 3mW/m². I hav”
- Exposure limits & oversight: “ factor 200 or even (in my case 10 000 000). Reducing the RF-Power density to 100µW/m² must be the goal. Thank you.”
- Li-Fi, fiber & alternatives: “I have used ethernet cables for multiple years. I am not using cell phones or WiFi or any ot”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I have used ethernet cables for multiple years. I am not using cell phones or WiFi or any other RF-emitting devices at all and I explained that I still have what neurologists describe as Aura's, Abscences and Drop attacks at a tiny fraction of what WiFi Routers emit: only 3mW/m². I have to stay in an environment where power density is 1µW/m² or less to be symptom free.
Todays limits said to be save by ICNIRP and other Organizations base on the 'heating effect'. There are countless of other health effects, I have explained one.
Please agree that the limits are too high by a factor 200 or even (in my case 10 000 000). Reducing the RF-Power density to 100µW/m² must be the goal.
Thank you.
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.