AI summary & topic connections

Opposes widespread deployment without safety testing and raises concerns about symptoms, lost wages and support for sensitive people.

  • Exposure limits & oversight: “If these systems have not been tested to prove the public’s health is not at risk they should not”
  • Electromagnetic sensitivity: “ wages from headaches and some are very sensitive to EMF. Who is going to pay for these injured people’s living expe”
  • Housing, work & access barriers: “basically weapons. People lose work and lose wages from headaches and some are very sensitive to EMF. Who is g”
  • Neurological symptoms & sleep: “s. People lose work and lose wages from headaches and some are very sensitive to EMF. Who is going to pay for”

Matched review of original text; attachments excluded. Review provenance

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
If these systems have not been tested to prove the public’s health is not at risk they should not be used so widespread. If these technologies are not safe they are basically weapons. People lose work and lose wages from headaches and some are very sensitive to EMF. Who is going to pay for these injured people’s living expenses? A few can I get Rich at the risk of millions. You are comply we demand and surgery demand safe technologies in our communities and planet. We have about WIFi. I think “rolling out” new tech is pointless unless you’re getting rich Doing it. We do not want it. We do not need it. Thankyou.
Exposure limits & oversightElectromagnetic sensitivityHousing, work & access barriersNeurological symptoms & sleep
Official source ↗Open this comment on its own →