AI summary & topic connections
The commenter calls for health-based exposure limits, protection of vulnerable communities and guidance for clinicians rather than prioritizing telecom convenience.
- Exposure limits & oversight: “vels that impact vulnerable communities. The radiation limits should be designed to protect human health, not to maximise indu”
- Children & vulnerable groups: “r towers, but the citizens of a town and the families at a school and the homeowners in a neighborhood should be protected from ex”
- Research & federal duties: “ maximise industry profits. Please bring the science to forefront in demanding reasonable radiation limits to protect”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
We need Health and Human Services to protect health and humans more than it protects telecommunications companies. It's OK for regulations on wireless radiation levels to be inconvenient for these companies; they will still build their towers, but the citizens of a town and the families at a school and the homeowners in a neighborhood should be protected from excessive radiation levels that impact vulnerable communities. The radiation limits should be designed to protect human health, not to maximise industry profits. Please bring the science to forefront in demanding reasonable radiation limits to protect vulnerable populations, and please support medical practitioners in recommending safe use of wirless technology.
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.