AI summary & topic connections
Describes RF concerns arising from radar-site employment, opposition to a neighborhood tower and involuntary smart meters, and concern for wildlife and forest.
- Occupational exposure: “a long time I have been wary of RF. I was a computer analyst at a giant radar site. There I sensed and learned about the adverse effects of this k”
- Towers & siting: “nd of energy. Later on, AT&T tried to put a cell tower into my neighborhood. It was frightening to a majority of us who chose to live ina r”
- Smart meters: “did not get installed. However, PG&E placed smart meters o our homes without our permission. We just want to live withou”
- Environmental effects: “ pollution and protect our neighborhood, its wildlife and forest. We don’t need it! We don’t want it!”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
For a long time I have been wary of RF. I was a computer analyst at a giant radar site. There I sensed and learned about the adverse effects of this kind of energy. Later on, AT&T tried to put a cell tower into my neighborhood. It was frightening to a majority of us who chose to live ina rural community. In the end the tower did not get installed. However, PG&E placed smart meters o our homes without our permission. We just want to live without so much pollution and protect our neighborhood, its wildlife and forest. We don’t need it! We don’t want it!
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.