AI summary & topic connections
The commenter requests updated independent testing, consideration of international findings and tower-related property impacts, and a pause on 6G pending review.
- Research & federal duties: “1996 is a long time ago, you need to do serious testing and include testing from other western country’s in your results”
- Exposure limits & oversight: “ts and update the actual science behind it. No 6G until the results are confirmed, considered and included in a national congressional document an”
- Towers & siting: “d best interest. Also, consideration of the property values that are decimated by having a cell tower in your area. You have to ask why they won’t put one next to sc”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
1996 is a long time ago, you need to do serious testing and include testing from other western country’s in your results. There have been many studies over several years and all seem to indicate a serious health concern. Stop talking to and taking money from lobbiests and update the actual science behind it. No 6G until the results are confirmed, considered and included in a national congressional document and voted on in the people’s health and best interest. Also, consideration of the property values that are decimated by having a cell tower in your area. You have to ask why they won’t put one next to schools or fire stations?!
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.