{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4436","body_sha256":"f59a268420c7b45fc01fb53a9f92753466bda3b8436abfde285965a07a72adeb","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"1996 is a long time ago, you need to do serious testing and include testing from other western country’s in your results"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"ts and update the actual science behind it.  No 6G until the results are confirmed, considered and included in a national congressional document an"},{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"d best interest.  Also, consideration of the property values that are decimated by having a cell tower in your area.  You have to ask why they won’t put one next to sc"}],"summary":"The commenter requests updated independent testing, consideration of international findings and tower-related property impacts, and a pause on 6G pending review.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-24T20:09:12Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"34a7de7f35dd6bcb32fc7639a5ecc63e04f282cf57f0209d7c54a6b610201454","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}