AI summary & topic connections

Advocates lower-emission alternatives, setbacks from neighborhoods and schools, wired connections and public information campaigns.

  • Exposure limits & oversight: “safer, lower-emitting technology. We should mandate that the infrastructure be set away from neighborhoods”
  • Towers & siting: “ting technology. We should mandate that the infrastructure be set away from neighborhoods, schools, and places wh”
  • Li-Fi, fiber & alternatives: “and animals congregate. We should encourage wired connections when possible. We should devote resource to informati”
  • Children & vulnerable groups: “frastructure be set away from neighborhoods, schools, and places where people and animals congregate. We s”
  • Environmental effects: “rhoods, schools, and places where people and animals congregate. We should encourage wired connections whe”

Matched review of original text; attachments excluded. Review provenance

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
It is foolhardy and dangerous to continue to deploy and expand technologies that emit EMFs when we know it is one of many toxic exposures contributing to our society's surge in chronic illnesses. We need to start making decisions on the basis of societal and individual health and longevity, not short term conveniences and money. We should devote money into alternative, safer, lower-emitting technology. We should mandate that the infrastructure be set away from neighborhoods, schools, and places where people and animals congregate. We should encourage wired connections when possible. We should devote resource to informational campaigns that help people understand the health impacts and minimize exposure.
Exposure limits & oversightTowers & sitingLi-Fi, fiber & alternativesChildren & vulnerable groupsEnvironmental effects
Official source ↗Open this comment on its own →