AI summary & topic connections
Reports removing a router after adverse effects, opposes newer networks and alleges civilians are being attacked with directed-energy weapons.
- Directed-energy / targeting allegations: “ all this was allowed. Can we please address Directed Energy Weapons next? That ties into this as well. There are many of ”
- Wi-Fi & indoor exposure: “this even a thing? I had to get rid of my 5G mobile router because of the adverse physical effects from it. I hav”
- Exposure limits & oversight: “ch is proven to destroy human cells. We need protections and we need them now. We need 5G to not be in existenc”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Let me start by saying there were scientists that disclosed years ago that 5G shouldn’t even exist. It’s weaponized and dangerous. They are correct in their assessment. On 5G. Poles are disclosures that it affects people and animals. Why is this even a thing? I had to get rid of my 5G mobile router because of the adverse physical effects from it. I have about 10 EMF plugs around my apartment to try to keep it out of life as much as possible.
I believe everyone in the government already knows this, yet now Trump is pushing for 6G which is proven to destroy human cells.
We need protections and we need them now. We need 5G to not be in existence anymore and we certainly absolutely do need 6G. This is a slow death for us all, and in the end someone will need to answer about why all this was allowed.
Can we please address Directed Energy Weapons next? That ties into this as well.
There are many of us civilians currently being attacked right now.
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.