Alleges wireless technologies are used for nonconsensual experimentation and neural surveillance, invokes…

I am responding from the perspective of a concerned member of the public. It is obvious that our government and/or private companies are misusing and abusing capabilities of 5G and Wi-Fi technologies to conduct unlawful, unwarranted, and non-consensual experimentations on carbon-based lifeforms; i.e., humans and animals. What I say here is informed by reputable sources and projects currently available to the public. There are Github projects that illustrate how wifi alone can be used to track the physical position of people in a room or building. It shows that wifi alone is enough. In violation of the Nuremburg code, these tools could be used to measure electricity and brainwaves in humans and animals. You can see a project here https://www.darpa.mil/research/programs/next generation-nonsurgical-neurotechnology It literally says on the page "This program is now complete This content is available for reference purposes. This page is no longer maintained". The Constitution of the United States tells us that personal sovereignty is a right protected in that guarantee to pursue "Life, Liberty, and Personal Happiness". The Constitution specifically guarantees personal sovereignty and neural privacy in the 1st, 4th, 5th, 9th, and 10th amendments. Third parties do not get to map a non-consenting American's brain for neural nets to be used in SI systems. The objectors often say "Oh, well, we cannot control the frequencies and EMF waves being blasted from the 5G towers across the country" That type of objection is faulty and technically incoherent. We set the rules with the FCC. The government has agencies that do signals. Congress just does not know which person to make an inquiry to. As a result, the government never does anything about it. No one in Congress (up on Capitol Hill) are technical enough to ask the right questions. Now companies are pushing 6G, 7G, and 8G. Even if the Congressmen (even young ones don't ask the right questions) did ask the right questions on Capitol Hill, the government would not give them the right answers. They either don't know enough or the wrong person is answering the inquiry. As Thomas Jefferson, the man who penned the Declaration of Independence for our country, said in passing, so I repeat to emphasize our country's philosophical roots: "I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.” — Thomas Jefferson, letter to Dr. Benjamin Rush, September 23, 1800. This quote is emblazoned in the Jefferson Memorial, which is just a short walk from the Washington, D.C. Holocaust Museum ironically (showing what our United States of America stood against in war. We freed the oppressed) I am aware that the objectors argue that no one cares and people sign their rights away all the time with tech companies. The objectors are wrong, however. Inventors and others (people who develop intellectual property) should not have to put up with being blasted with 5G/emfs/Wifi (to scan their brains for neural nets to be used in SI projects) without their consent as a reward for their subject matter expertise and success in life. Just ask James Giordano, PhD https://inss.ndu.edu/Media/News/Article/4599513/cia-mind-control-mkultra-energy-weapons-are-real-why-a-pentagon-advisor-wont-ru/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cPWJfjXu7M He's an expert in this area. https://inss.ndu.edu/Media/Biographies/Article-View/Article/4044640/james-giordano/ The Constitution of the United States is a holy and sacred document. The 1st, 4th, 5th, 9th, and 10th amendment rights protect a person's sovereignty, privacy of their mind. Neither the government, private companies, nor other individuals can map another person's mind without their consent. People walking in the public square should not have to be concerned that databrokers and 5G/Wifi/EMF nuremburg code violators are teaming up to scan and sell their thoughts and neural pathways. It's unconstitutional and not allowed if you read CFAA. And it's not "conspiracy theory" as you can see from the citations above, you have experts talking about it. Go ask Schindler, he used to work in the DoD. He wrote this article: https://topsecretumbra.substack.com/p/the-greatest-threat-to-american-spies Some hypothesize that "Havana Syndrome" results from exposure to directed microwave or radiofrequency energy - these are the two leading theories under investigation. "Havana Syndrome" may be a result of weaponized/directed EMF/5G/Wifi blasts. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.