AI summary & topic connections
Opposes towers near homes and places children gather, cites personal detector observations and developmental concerns, and requests public-health priorities and community protections.
- Towers & siting: “communication towers should be located well away from schools”
- Children & vulnerable groups: “Children especially need safe environments that support learning”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I strongly oppose the placement of wireless communication towers or other wireless devices near residential communities, schools, churches, daycares, parks, and other places where children and families spend their time.
Based on my own observations using an EMF detector, I have concerns about the levels of electromagnetic radiation emitted by these towers. I believe these emissions may pose potential health risks, especially to children whose bodies and brains are still developing. While I am not including scientific studies in this letter, there are many researchers and organizations that have raised concerns about the long-term effects of electromagnetic radiation exposure on human health.
I do not believe that faster wireless internet speeds or any other reasons justify placing these towers close to areas where people live, learn, worship, and gather. Our society is already becoming increasingly dependent on internet-connected devices, and I am concerned that the continued expansion of wireless infrastructure encourages even greater screen use and digital dependency.
Children especially need safe environments that support learning, social interaction, physical activity, and healthy development. For these reasons, I believe communication towers should be located well away from schools, churches, daycares, neighborhoods, and other places frequented by families and children.
I respectfully ask that decision-makers prioritize public health and community well-being when considering the placement of these towers.
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.