AI summary & topic connections
The commenter advocates safer technology and updated guidelines, arguing wireless sources harm people and ecosystems despite existing independent research.
- Exposure limits & oversight: “ technology but safe technology. Out- dated government guidelines do not reflect the current science, so manufacturersare still al”
- Research & federal duties: “ces,and other wireless devices. Thousands of independent studies from around the world now show wireless radiation causes extensi”
- Environmental effects: “microwave radiation. Adults, children, pets ,pollinators, trees and plants are suffering from cell towers, small cell antennas ”
- Children & vulnerable groups: “toxic levels of microwave radiation. Adults, children, pets ,pollinators, trees and plants are suffering from cell to”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
The message is not no technology but safe technology.
Out- dated government guidelines do not reflect the current science, so manufacturersare still allowed to sell products and install wireless infrastructure that emits toxic levels of microwave radiation.
Adults, children, pets ,pollinators, trees and plants are suffering from cell towers, small cell antennas , utility smart meters and our own cell phones, routers, tablets, laptops, wearables, baby monitors, gaming systems, appliances,and other wireless devices.
Thousands of independent studies from around the world now show wireless radiation causes extensive harm to people and the enviornment.
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.