AI summary & topic connections
The commenter describes repeated moves due to radiowave sickness and symptoms around RF exposure, challenges older siting rules, and calls for stronger protections for children and pregnancy.
- Electromagnetic sensitivity: “I have already had to move 3 times due to radiowave sickness. Once from Riversode, CA in 2020 and again from Somis, CA (south”
- Housing, work & access barriers: “I have already had to move 3 times due to radiowave sickness. Once from Riversode, CA in 2020 and a”
- Towers & siting: “lley, and again I am being threatened by the proposed cell tower on Dog Bar Rd that is currently being fought in federal court. U”
- Exposure limits & oversight: “nty has no ability to object to cell towers. Guidelines which were set in the 1990s. Remember what the phones looked like in the 90s wi”
- Children & vulnerable groups: “owave radiation penetrates much further into children's skulls that adult's skulls. In other areas of life, we set the exposure”
- Reproduction & pregnancy: “exposure limits at a level that will protect pregnant women and children. Why should this be any different? China requires p”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I have already had to move 3 times due to radiowave sickness. Once from Riversode, CA in 2020 and again from Somis, CA (southern California which is extremely cell tower). I moved to a rural portion of Northern California, Grass Valley, and again I am being threatened by the proposed cell tower on Dog Bar Rd that is currently being fought in federal court. Under the current rules, the county has no ability to object to cell towers. Guidelines which were set in the 1990s. Remember what the phones looked like in the 90s with the antennas and no internet? Those guidelines are as antiquated as those phones. When I had to return to Southern California for a couple of weeks, I had a rash on my entire upper body from radiofrequency exposure. I also get headaches and chest pain.
Also, the microwave radiation penetrates much further into children's skulls that adult's skulls. In other areas of life, we set the exposure limits at a level that will protect pregnant women and children. Why should this be any different? China requires pregnant women to wear radiofrequency shielding belly bands and Russia has limits on how much minors should use cell phones daily. What is that saying when Russia and China care more about protecting their citizens than we do?
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.