{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5815","body_sha256":"97a287bc3a5d6d9c8fad05908bc8d25ef2d76973cb4dfa56aee83f37ad06b3aa","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"ehs","topics":[{"id":"ehs","evidence":"I have already had to move 3 times due to radiowave sickness. Once from Riversode, CA in 2020 and again from Somis, CA (south"},{"id":"access","evidence":"I have already had to move 3 times due to radiowave sickness. Once from Riversode, CA in 2020 and a"},{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"lley, and again I am being threatened by the proposed cell tower on Dog Bar Rd that is currently being fought in federal court. U"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"nty has no ability to object to cell towers. Guidelines which were set in the 1990s. Remember what the phones looked like in the 90s wi"},{"id":"children","evidence":"owave radiation penetrates much further into children's skulls that adult's skulls. In other areas of life, we set the exposure"},{"id":"reproductive","evidence":"exposure limits at a level that will protect pregnant women and children. Why should this be any different? China requires p"}],"summary":"The commenter describes repeated moves due to radiowave sickness and symptoms around RF exposure, challenges older siting rules, and calls for stronger protections for children and pregnancy.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T16:50:58Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"a379be3053ac90e22f82e6449bb3e05bc1d738c684b6c16d9565e578aee3654e","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}