AI summary & topic connections
Advocates residential setbacks of at least 300 meters for smaller base stations and typically half a mile or more for larger facilities. Supplies a list of attached research documents offered in support of those siting proposals.
- Towers & siting: “a relatively low-height "small cell" base station (such as those on lamp posts) should be no closer than 300 meters to a residence.”
- Exposure limits & oversight: “a large "macro cell" facility typically should be half a mile or more from any home.”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Thank you for the opportunity to submit information regarding biological effects and potential health hazards of low-level, long-term exposure to radiofrequency radiation (RFR).
I am uploading here several recent, well-written RFR-related scientific documents. Each one is relevant to the ongoing campaign by many doctors and scientists worldwide to restrict mobile phone base stations (cell towers) to locations at least 300 meters away from residential homes.
Currently, in most countries, telecommunications providers are allowed to site base stations almost wherever they want. Yet much scientific evidence now supports the idea that a relatively low-height "small cell" base station (such as those on lamp posts) should be no closer than 300 meters to a residence. The same body of evidence suggests that a large "macro cell" facility typically should be half a mile or more from any home.
Upload #1: Akkam 2020 MWR blood ROS.pdf
Upload #2: Cell carrier frequencies.pdf
Upload #3: Hardell 2022 EHS nr base stns.pdf
Upload #4: McCredden 2026 EMF sensitivity survey.pdf
Upload #5: Nilsson 2023 5G cases two men.pdf
Upload #6: Nilsson 2023 MPBS 5G caused EMR-S.pdf
Upload #7: Nilsson 2025 RFR memory probs children.pdf
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.