The commenter cites literature on light and electromagnetic effects, questions exposure standards, raises…

There is already so much research - which has existed for decades - showing the impact of light, frequency and magnetism on plants and animals. Read John Ott's book Health and Light, published in 1973, documenting these effects. European countries have different standards - even for their cell phones, the SAR ratings are much lower. To act as if we are unaffected by frequency is unfathomable. Now that we have Wi-Fi and wireless devices everywhere, even in our NICUs and schools, it is irresponsible to not acknowledge the effect that these frequencies can have on children and infants who have much less dense brain bone structures. We also need to consider the light we live within. Full spectrum incandescent is by far the healthiest option. Did you know that animal breeders can even change the sex ratios of their litters by altering the light frequencies they are exposed to? To make matters worse, we are now dealing with the effect of the growing South American Anomaly (SAA) which is lessening the geomagnetic field of the earth. This amplifies the effects of non native EMF, SARs, etc . It is imperative that we tackle this important issue from every possible angle immediately. Thank you.