{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4800","number":"4800","name":"Nancy Buono","organization":"","posted":"2026-10-26T04:00Z","received":"2026-10-20T04:00Z","body":"There is already so much research - which has existed for decades - showing the impact of light, frequency and magnetism on plants and animals. Read John Ott's book Health and Light, published in 1973, documenting these effects. \n\nEuropean countries have different standards - even for their cell phones, the SAR ratings are much lower. To act as if we are unaffected by frequency is unfathomable.\n\nNow that we have Wi-Fi and wireless devices everywhere, even in our NICUs and schools, it is irresponsible to not acknowledge the effect that these frequencies can have on children and infants who have much less dense brain bone structures. \n\nWe also need to consider the light we live within. Full spectrum incandescent is by far the healthiest option.\nDid you know that animal breeders can even change the sex ratios of their litters by altering the light frequencies they are exposed to? \n\nTo make matters worse, we are now dealing with the effect of the growing South American Anomaly (SAA) which is lessening the geomagnetic field of the earth. This amplifies the effects of non native EMF, SARs, etc .\n\nIt is imperative that we tackle this important issue from every possible angle immediately.\n\nThank you.\n\n","attachments":[],"attachment_inventory":true,"withheld":false,"source":"https://www.regulations.gov/comment/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4800","tags":["child-development","exposure-places","research-evidence"],"source_hash":"21e559f0b426c73528ecc71cd3c5612f66315f3b049b3ca5e62d68e305928573","slug":"child-development-comment-4800","classification":{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4800","body_sha256":"2b5d2a2463efaea20196827a12de55532f96379e127027f13cccafa9696bd4fd","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"cy and magnetism on plants and animals. Read John Ott's book Health and Light, published in 1973, documenting these effects. "},{"id":"standards","evidence":"ing these effects. \n\nEuropean countries have different standards - even for their cell phones, the SAR ratings are much lower. To"},{"id":"children","evidence":"he effect that these frequencies can have on children and infants who have much less dense brain bone structures. \n\nWe also need t"},{"id":"wifi","evidence":"frequency is unfathomable.\n\nNow that we have Wi-Fi and wireless devices everywhere, even in our NICUs and schools, it is irresponsible t"}],"summary":"The commenter cites literature on light and electromagnetic effects, questions exposure standards, raises concerns about wireless devices around infants and children, and proposes considering lighting and changes in Earth's magnetic field.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-26T22:22:05Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"d66148382ea8a2801d8ec5a70ef5a1365ed76eda7a13e18e7c0c592099cfc520","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"},"forum_topics":["research","standards","children","wifi"],"primary_topic":"research","forum_title":"The commenter cites literature on light and electromagnetic effects, questions exposure standards, raises…"}