AI summary & topic connections

The commenter urges immediate regulation of wireless exposure, argues existing research already demonstrates harm, and expresses distrust of health-agency research.

  • Exposure limits & oversight: “ation exposure risk to us all. Let's get it regulated NOW!!! Please!!!!”
  • Research & federal duties: “cause to human bodies. We don't really need years of study by agencies that are simply trying to push through more detrimen”
  • Wi-Fi & indoor exposure: “ I know understands the dangers of EMFs and WIFI Radiation exposure. It's been studied. We all know of the harm it can and does ca”

Matched review of original text; attachments excluded. Review provenance

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
SERIOUSLY? Everyone I know understands the dangers of EMFs and WIFI Radiation exposure. It's been studied. We all know of the harm it can and does cause to human bodies. We don't really need years of study by agencies that are simply trying to push through more detrimental stuff on the public. But, if you really need us to tell you we're against this radiation exposure ... here it is. STOP POISONING US!!! Enough is enough. We know what we know and so do you all. We saw all the phony research on autism, covid, vaccines, etc. I could tell 35 years ago that SIDS was mostly due to vaccines on babies at 2, 4 and 6 month olds. Yet, here we are and the "experts" are still arguing that obvious link. Let's not take any more time to handle this radiation exposure risk to us all. Let's get it regulated NOW!!! Please!!!!