AI summary & topic connections
Requests stronger tower siting and power-density controls and lower classroom wireless exposure. Raises concerns about industry influence, children’s neurological health and artificial lighting, and calls for engineering remedies. The scientific and foreign-policy claims are the commenter’s assertions.
- Exposure limits & oversight: “We need more oversight regarding the proliferation of cell phone mast placeme”
- Towers & siting: “ accuracy, power density. We shouldn't have cell phone masts that are 300 ft from classroom like we do here at the ”
- Children & vulnerable groups: “hat are an issue. Wireless proliferation in classrooms is also out of control and the effects of it are unkno”
- Wi-Fi & indoor exposure: “tional accuracy can also come into play with wi-fi routers in the classroom, so the kids aren't in an "overpowere”
- Neurological symptoms & sleep: “ the only reason we are seeing more cases of autism, adhd, anxiety issues. I grew up in the 80's and 90's. I knew one k”
- LED headlights & glare: “spectrum of newer lighting technologies like LEDs and older tech like fluorescent lighting. There's no ”
- Research & federal duties: “rm from this technology, but it is buried by industry funded research. People are wising up to industry and government coll”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
We need more oversight regarding the proliferation of cell phone mast placement, directional accuracy, power density. We shouldn't have cell phone masts that are 300 ft from classroom like we do here at the local highschool. It's not necessary and it the amount of radio frequency radiation saturated the air keeps increasing all the time, so there really is no way to accurately study possible dangers. There is research out there showing harm from this technology, but it is buried by industry funded research. People are wising up to industry and government collusion. We can be so much smarter than we are being with the placement of towers. Adopt standards like other countries in Europe where you aren't allowed to have a tower within 500 meters of a school. Make the providers dial down power density of the cell masts so that areas are not "overpowered". Also, the whole idea that non-ionizing radiation is safe, is totally laughable. Again, there is research, buried under industry funded research, that demonstrates that non-ionizing radiation is not harmless. The people understand that the big telecom companies are getting a free pass, because of lobbying and "cozy" relationships and partnerships with government entities. The Federal Communications Act of 1996 hasn't been updated for safety. We only had 2G then. There was a bogus attempt to modify it in 2021 or 2022, effectively keeping it exactly the same in regards to safety.
It's not just cell phone masts that are an issue. Wireless proliferation in classrooms is also out of control and the effects of it are unknown. Placement, power density, and directional accuracy can also come into play with wi-fi routers in the classroom, so the kids aren't in an "overpowered" environment. It's not supernatural that we are having so many neurodegenerative conditions amongst young people that cannot be explained away by saying our diagnostic tech and diagnostic capabilities have improved. Yes they have improved, but that doesn't mean that's the only reason we are seeing more cases of autism, adhd, anxiety issues. I grew up in the 80's and 90's. I knew one kid with anxiety issues. Now a majority of kids struggle with anxiety. I believe a big part of this is due to wireless radiation proliferation and unnatural light spectrum of newer lighting technologies like LEDs and older tech like fluorescent lighting. There's no intelligent reason that we have to live in an "overpowered" environment. Talk to utility engineers and RF engineers...it can be remedied.
Community corner
Community discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.