All comment threads

CERTIFICATE OF IDENTIFICATION ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE that is “covid-19” it’s an inorganic alien parasite artificial intelligence frequency using 5G (5th generation) cellphone towers …if you sleep with your “Smart” cell phone (an alien weapon actually) on your body you will wake up sick, coughing (nanotech fembots lodged in your lungs 🫁) bronchitis inflammation of your lungs 🫁 or heart ❤️ (myocarditis- inflammation of your heart). We all have nanotechnology “smart dust” in our bodies (chemtrails, GMOs,vaccines)… what CURES this negative alien A.I. virus? Ivermectin an antiparasite which is only fermented oyster mushrooms… (fermented kombucha, fermented kefir is prebiotics and probiotics that builds your good bacteria army in your amazing body)! What if… 1. COVID 19 (Certificate of Identification Artificial Intelligence) was a psyop to expose the dangers of 5G already mitigated by 45’s COVFEFE, and the Deep State’s Transhumanism agenda to enslave Humanity (Cloudmind Cancelled)..? 2. The “Vaccine”, mostly saline, was a psyop to expose corrupt CDC, WHO, WEF, Big Pharma and promote natural health and God immunity…?  3. The Lockdowns during Operation Warpspeed were to keep the civilians safe while the D.U.M.B.s were being cleaned out of the child sex trafficking, adrenochrome labs and the satanic antihuman death culture creatures’ genetic chimera labs…? 4. We are watching a movie and Trump and JFK Jr., the White Hats and the BRICS Alliance and Space Force and Elon Musk’s Starlink have offworld multidimensional assistance to expose and evict the darkness and liberate Humanity during this Ascension Great Awakening..?  5. Operation Warpspeed was to speed up the Deep State Dark Cult’s evil Agenda 2030 shadow plans to disclose to We The People the TRUTH THAT SETS US FREE..?  6. Where We Go One We Go All.  7.Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming.  8.TRUST THE PLAN. 9.GOD WINS.  10.The Best Is Yet To Come. 11.Changing of the Old Guard. 12.Dawn of the Golden Age of Humanity. 13. Devolution, ReConstitution, Restored Republic. 14. Slow drip of truth disclosure then FLOOD. 15. It had to be this way.  16. We the People Had to Be Shown. 17. Thanks for reading.  www.goodlion.tv  “The Greatest Show On Earth” 😊🙏🇺🇸🌎🍿🎥

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

My sensitivity to EMFs began with an attempt to upgrade my cell phone to a Iphone 3G in 2009. Immediate symptoms included neck stiffness, inability to turn my head, head burning and tinnitus. These issues progressed to include some loss of vision in one eye, intermittent active eye floaters and gut issues. I quickly returned the phone and stayed with 2G non-smart phones until they were no longer useable. I have now had an Iphone 7plus for a number of years and use 4G cell data only, no wifi. I think this is because there does not appear to be a constant "checking" signal with cell data. I am unable to have wifi in my home or office due to my symptoms. I still have all the same problems, some not an regularly; however, I still have head (nerve?) burning and ear ringing at different sounds and decibel levels constantly. I also have gut issues regularly. I do not want to upgrade to a 5G phone but am realizing I can use less and less of the required apps to conduct business functions. I will add I was an extremely healthy person prior to this disaster.

Please study the effects of technology on humans. Data centers, cell towers, wifi, cell phones, and all other recent technologies. People are reporting illness, cancers, migraines, and more, yet nothing is being done. Please do something.

This filing was submitted as an attachment. Open the document below to read the comment.

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because my family and I live 50 yards from a large 5G tower that hovers above a track and field and a playground. I can see the tower from my front yard and my family and I have experienced frequent headaches, brain fog and sleep disturbances. There are two children in our area who have been diagnosed with leukemia and it is difficult to not assume the 5G tower could have had some impact. We live in a densely populated neighborhood where many families are impacted by the use of this large tower. In addition to the tower, AT&T and Verizon have placed at least Four 5G "boosters" within a 100 yard radius of my home. They are in our alleyways and along our sidewalks. My Broadband RF meter detects levels far above "safe" at extreme levels (87,000 µW/m²). My children are exposed to this around the clock while at home. Would you feel comfortable with your family in this environment?

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because I live by a large cell phone tower that is emitting radiation. I have read the book "The Invisible Rainbow" by Arthur Firstenberg, which gives a very strong case that EMF exposures can cause serious health effect. I have also read the book "The Body Electric" by Robert Becker, a scientist who studied the impact of EMF on biological systems and health. It is very difficult for a person like me to have the resources to prove that health issues are caused by EMFs. But it should be the responsibility of the government to make sure that environmental effects are not introduced which are dangerous to human health and potentially to the health of all biological things. It is difficult to prove which adverse health effects are being caused by EMFs since there is essentially no control group -- everyone is being bathed in 4G, 5G etc. Is it just a coincidence that the whole Covid-19 "pandemic" happened at the same time as the rollout of 5G cell towers across the country? I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

I am chronically ill for years now and cannot heal in the environment most of us live in, with cell towers in every direction. I recently had an Achilles Heel Rupture to add to the long list of diseases and bc I live in a Condo, I am bombarded by this god forsaken Radiation from every apt and towers for miles around me. After 8 mos of agony, I had to travel to rural Mexico where they block wifi signals at the clinic I chose and finally started to repair my tendon in a month's time. This exposure is killing people including me. Stop this madness now! There are alot of us suffering and you know perfectly well that you are harming us. In fact, I have come to believe through exhaustive research that this life altering radiation is intentional.

I am very affected by Electro-magnetic Freqencies (EMFs). One of the first things I noticed was using Facetime on my I-phone. The first time I did it, it burned my face. I got off quickly. I tried one other time and had the same experience. I've never done Facetime after that. When I use my I-phone, I put it on speaker, at least an arm's length away. We also pull out the router every night to shut-down the WiFi when we are sleeping. We've been doing this for many years, and I'm sure, as a person sensitive to EMFs, this has helped me health-wise. I have met people who are very sick from wireless radiation.

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: During 2021 when 5G was introduced to my neighborhood, I developed tinnitus, vertigo, and was unable to sleep in my bedroom secondary to headaches. I discovered, by using an EMF meter, that some of my issues were due to the Smart meter that had been placed on our home, outside, electrical meter. Once this was removed, I was able to sleep in my bedroom but I still experience the tinnitus especially in some parts of my home. However, when I am outside walking at the park, the tinnitus is almost totally resolved as I am away from the home wifi. I have also noticed that flies die very shortly after entering the home which I suspect might also be due to the wifi exposure. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.