Research, evidence & monitoring

I see hundreds of clients in my clinic with all manner of diseases. Brain Fog, Cancer, fatigue, Afib etc When these same clients go out of town, away from Cell towers, they get better. 5G towers put near homes are causing the most havoc. My wife gets ill every time we go to the downtown area of our city, where there are a huge number of towers. She can't go to our downtown area because of the cell towers. Studies have been shown towers must be at least 2000 or more away to mitigate damage.

For too long, telecommunications companies have gotten away with gambling with human and animal health via radiation exposure. We need real controlled studies about the potential harms and long-term effects of radiation and chronic exposure to non-ionizing radiation, including children’s vulnerability, long-term exposure, environmental and wildlife impacts, and potential health effects involving reproduction, the immune system, and DNA damage. Here's a link to a relevant news article on this topic, which unpacks the harms potential of radiation pollution: https://www.newsweek.com/migratory-birds-bee-navigation-5g-technology-electromagnetic-radiation-934830 Pollution affects us all, and no person has consented to being chronically poisoned by radiation exposure because informed consent of harms has never occurred. Updated guidelines that take into consideration changes in technology since 1996--and which place a moratorium on new technologies until their potential harms can be properly understood from an informed-consent perspective--are imperative for human and animal health and general welfare.

Thousands of peer-reviewed articles (https://bioinitiative.org/?sm_guid=MTA1NDMyOXw1OTY3NTg4OXwtMXx0ZHJlaWVyQGhvdG1haWwuY29tfDkwNzgyMTd8fDB8MHwzMzQ1NzQxNzR8MTA2MXwwfDB8fDE5NjY5ODJ8MA2) have shown that wireless radiation at levels allowed by the FCC can harm children, adults, plants, trees, birds and their migration, pets, wildlife, pollinators and other insects. The FCC must follow the D.C. Circuit Court's 2020 order in EHT v. FCC to address how wireless radiation affects children and the environment, the health implications of long-term exposure, and the increase in the vast number of devices and changes in technology since 1996.

There has now been an abundant amount of research data that strongly suggests wireless radiation is harmful. It is very late now, but finally the FCC is willing to do what the court has ordered it to do in 2021! The past FCC was dominated by industry-friendly, biased and poorly-done research that should never have happened. The FCC should be regulating the industry instead of accepting industry-produced "research" that was scientifically inadequate, really indefensible and not relevant to real-world conditions. Why has the FCC taken so long to do the right thing, follow the objective and relevant science, and comply with the COURT ORDER? No doubt there are laziness and willful blindness at play at the FCC and excessive industry influence. Please do an objective and comprehensive look at the independent (non-industry sponsored) research. Millions of people have been unnecessarily exposed to excessive levels of radiation. The FCC has placed a deaf ear and blind eye for too long even when many have sent relevant and accurate research to you. This must change for the sake of the health of many people, and especially children.

There has now been an abundant amount of research data that strongly suggests wireless radiation is harmful. It is very late now, but finally the FCC is willing to do what the court has ordered it to do in 2021! The past FCC was dominated by industry-friendly, biased and poorly-done research that should never have happened. The FCC should be regulating the industry instead of accepting industry-produced "research" that was scientifically inadequate, really indefensible and not relevant to real-world conditions. Why has the FCC taken so long to do the right thing, follow the objective and relevant science, and comply with the COURT ORDER? No doubt there are laziness and willful blindness at play at the FCC and excessive industry influence. Please do an objective and comprehensive look at the independent (non-industry sponsored) research. Millions of people have been unnecessarily exposed to excessive levels of radiation. The FCC has placed a deaf ear and blind eye for too long even when many have sent relevant and accurate research to you. This must change for the sake of the health of many people, and especially children.

I am responding from the perspective of a concerned member of the public, a Dual USA and Canadian citizen, and as one who is negatively affected by man-made electromagnetic radiation. I personally suffer from tinnitus and severe vertigo. When I was living in a city with smart meters, cell towers, neighbors wi-fi, etc. my symptoms were becoming more severe as time went by. About 2 years, ago we moved to an acreage where the emf levels are low the great majority of the time and since we have moved here I have not had any more vertigo attacks. In my opinion, man-made electromagnetic radiation is the latest, greatest environmental pollutant and it has become ubiquitous in our present world. Many people as well as all life in the environment is negatively affected, as we have evolved to function in the natural electromagnetic environment. I support the FCC taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge the FCC to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

When very overweight and no longer losing weight, my nutritionist recommended that I consider turning off all my computer and bedroom power every night, making my landlines corded instead of wireless, (I didn't have a smart phone), and make all computer technology corded with EMF protected cords from Less EMF. In other words, he suspected my high EMF environment (like most Americans) was causing weight gain. I was eating a diet that normally allowed me to lose weight fast, but it had stalled. After 3 weeks of dramatically reducing home EMFs, my daily weight loss restarted and continued when the only thing I changed was emf exposure-not diet or exercise. At that point, I spent the money and bought expensive meters and studied EMFs.

See paper, "Safety of Wireless Technologies--The Scientific View", which explains the connection between wireless exposures and chronic illnesses identified by the U.S. Navy Office of Medical Research in 1971, also explaining the umbrella mechanism of action that can explain the diverse biological and health effects. https://manhattanneighbors.org/safety-of-wireless-technologies-the-scientific-view/

I have a good friend who must live with shielding from emf fabric due to being so sick that she cannot function. Exposure to emfs must be thoroughly investigated through research done not by technology funded research but by scientists with no conflict of interest. Our children and our lives must be protected from this reckless exposure. With cell towers (large or small cells) near homes and in neighborhoods and schools, our children are in danger. Exposure to emf's also is proven to affect our children's concentration, wildlife, and even bees ability to return to their hives. Do you want a cell tower near your child's window where they sleep and in neighborhoods where children walk and play? Please be wise halt this madness and provide research that is done with integrity and that is not funded by the tech companies who profit from additional cell towers being installed. Thank you,

I strongly oppose cell towers within 100 miles of any population. I also oppose smart meters. We live in a townhouse that has 6 smart meters within 6 feet of our bedroom. Since the meters have been installed, we have suffered significant health issues that have disappeared when we stay overnight somewhere else. Several studies done in several countries have all concluded using cell phones increases the risk of cancer. Several people have reported ill effects from living close to a cell tower. Cell towers disrupt other living organisms, particularly bees, by decreasing their populations and disrupting their form of communication and flying patterns. I do not consent to cell towers being anywhere near where people inhabit.