All comment threads

It is long past time to make sure that we are all protected from electromagnetic fields and wireless radiation. Many studies have been done that show the damage can be severe, especially for higher radiation levels such as 5G. The next generation that is being proposed, 6 G and higher, will be even worse. Some people are more seriously affected than others, but already it is hard for those most affected to find places where they can be comfortable. However, even those who are not aware of it are being affected. All these forms of radiation damage not only humans, but also domestic animals, wildlife, and even plants. It would be nice if industry was more capable of restraining itself or if education about the dangers wasn’t being smothered by monetary influences, but since that is not proving to be the case, we need laws and regulations to stop the increasing prevalence of radiation before we do further damage to ourselves and our planet.

Please do not place the profit-margin of big tech corporations over the health and well-being of USA citizens. The science and clear, verifiable, and indisputable. Be on the right side of history!

To whom it may concern, Current new cars have such bright headlights, that you are blinded day & night. Cars are running with the brights on during a sunny day. Lights are so bright, that you cannot even see their turn signals in use. Even worse with high trucks and SUVs against regular sized cars. By now US car manufacturers should have a way to auto dim the lights during the day and when approaching oncoming traffic. Europe has new regulations for smart headlight systems. Thank you, Andrew Papanestor a21andrew@yahoo.com

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a parent, family member, caregiver, healthcare professional, and genuinely concerned member of the public. The harmful effects of EMFs, RF and wireless radiation exposure are not well known (to the public) and truly objective studies performed by people and organizations who in no way profit are not publicized, are dismissed or suppressed. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside objective scientific evidence (meaning no one or no organization benefits in any way, shape, or form). I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

I am the superintendent of schools in a school district of about 10,000 students. Our district has had agreements in place for cell towers on school property for approximately 12 years. Over the past year or so, we have heard from some of our parents expressing concern over RF exposure from cell towers near schools. In response, the district installed RF monitoring systems on the campuses that have cell towers onsite. The owner of the cell towers agreed to pay for the monitoring equipment, but the district pays for the monitoring service. We are transparent with data and share it with parent or community member who has interest. From the school lens, we would definitely like to see updated exposure guidelines based on the most recent research. Additionally, we would like to see a requirement for cell tower owners to do more than provide predictive analytics. We recommend that these companies, at their own cost, be required to monitor RF frequencies on school campuses and other public spaces where children are regularly present and make the data accessible to the public.

I believe cell towers are harmful. A tower went up approximately 1000yrds from my house over 10 yrs ago. I developed severe seizures shortly afterwards. My seizures were one every nine months . Dr said I did not have epilepsy and they had no idea what caused this. I would feel an overwhelming sense of something coming from the direction of that tower right before a seizure. I would point in that direction and tell my husband " here it comes. All of my seizures accused at home. We have a metal roof and I heard Robert Kennedy Jr speak on the effects of EMFs. He stated that metal conducts EMFs. He also stated that EMFs CAN cause seizures. He said its not common but it does happen. He said that some people are more sensitive than others. He was also banned from all soccial media for one yr( by the powrrs that be) after he went on a certain network and told what he knows. The PTB also threatened to turn that networks satellite off if they had Kennedy back on their show. Kennedy ran for president after his ban was lifted. I have EMFSOLUTIONS.COMs products on my smart meter and in my house and in my vehicle. Ive done much better since then. I was out on a country highway a while back. I went through a section where I passed 8 towers in a 20 mile stretch. The EMFs where totally overwhelming. True story...

We need regulation on LED headlights. They have gotten way too bright and making the roads more dangerous.

Merci de lancer enfin une

Please do the research to verify what has already been found to be harmful to our health. The radiation from these utilities is truly frightening. I don't want this wireless technology installed at my home but was told I have to pay a monthly penalty to not use this new technology because I want to keep my family and myself safe. Please help to eliminate this danger in our homes and schools.

It's a well documented scientific fact that wireless radiation of all kinds is dangerous for a myriad of reasons and hasn't been held to the scrutiny it should, considering it's impact on all adults and especially children with growing brains and bodies. There hasn't been adequate safety testing or accountability by those who push it's unlimited use. This is unbelievable in 2026, since it's dangers have been well known for years, falling on mainly deaf ears. .