AI summary & topic connections

The commenter asks HHS to prioritize non-ionizing medical-imaging alternatives and assess cumulative exposures, noting a personal choice of quantitative transmission imaging instead of mammography and referring to an attached detailed submission.

  • Research & federal duties: “I urge HHS to prioritize safer, non-ionizing alternatives and rigorously evaluate cumulative exposures.”

Matched review of original text; attachments excluded. Review provenance

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I am submitting this comment as a concerned individual (age over 18) regarding potential health effects of RF/EMF exposures and ionizing radiation from medical imaging. My full detailed comments, including personal experience choosing Quantitative Transmission (QT) Imaging in lieu of mammography, supporting evidence, and recommendations, are contained in the attached PDF. I urge HHS to prioritize safer, non-ionizing alternatives and rigorously evaluate cumulative exposures.

Attachments · 1

Original public attachments. Their contents are not included in the category review.

Research & federal duties
Official source ↗Open this comment on its own →