AI summary & topic connections
Requests a comprehensive federal assessment of acute and cumulative device emissions and health and environmental effects.
- Research & federal duties: “m in healthcare industry. I am not aware of comprehensive statement by HHS or similar authoritative agency on safety of th”
- Environmental effects: “be good as it pertains to impact on humans, animals and environment.”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Federal Research Priorities
16. What are the highest priority research gaps regarding EMF and RF radiation and public health that the federal health agencies should address?
I am in healthcare industry. I am not aware of comprehensive statement by HHS or similar authoritative agency on safety of the wide range of RF and EMF devices and the levels - acute or cumulative - of emissions. For my tax monies I expect a government agency to step up and step in to the gap created by industry who likely are not enthusiastic for such studies to be conducted. My position for science-based conclusions goes across industries that have widespread exposure to humans, animals and the environment. The potential that a large number of sub-studies can be conducted to reach a comprehensive conclusion and I hope the agency gets after the project. I am pessimistic the results will be good as it pertains to impact on humans, animals and environment.
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.