Acknowledges competing scientific views and calls for independent research free of industry influence, wi…

I am a professional software developer with a long career. I’ve heard both sides of the wireless radiation harm controversy. Some scientists claim there can be no problem, and they have strong arguments to support their position. Others have evidence that the potential for harm is real. AND THEY HAVE EVIDENCE. If I learned one thing from COVID, it to distrust government and industry. It’s shameful but true. If you are so certain there is no potential for harm, then fund independent research. Don’t let industry lobbyists influence the research or the analysis. I suspect there is pressure to avoid research because, like AI, we don’t want to fall behind in the race for technology. MOST LIKELY INDUSTRY IS AFRAID OF LIABILITY AND RESTRICTIONS. But none of this justifies flying blind, and putting future generations at risk. If no dangers are found after thorough and honest research, then we can all rest easier. And if dangers and risks are confirmed, then we can research mitigation strategies for keeping our communities safe, while still maximizing our technological advances. Until this research is done, this will be an ongoing concern, and a tax on the credibility of national leadership. Sincerely, Robert from Ohio