AI summary & topic connections
Questions the need for further inquiry, cites existing research and argues that insurance exclusions reflect EMF-related risks.
- Other concerns: “ electromagnetic fields and have very clear “electromagnetic field exclusions””
- Research & federal duties: “place. There are thousands upon thousands of research studies that show this poison is killing us. Also Electromagnetic Field”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I'm not sure why this exercise is even taking place. There are thousands upon thousands of research studies that show this poison is killing us. Also Electromagnetic Fields are defined as a “pollutant” by insurance companies and often require special coverage as a “pollutant” in policy enhancements
Due to the high risk that electromagnetic (EMF) field exposure poses, most insurance companies do not cover electromagnetic fields and have very clear “electromagnetic field exclusions”
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.