AI summary & topic connections

Questions the need for further inquiry, cites existing research and argues that insurance exclusions reflect EMF-related risks.

  • Other concerns: “ electromagnetic fields and have very clear “electromagnetic field exclusions””
  • Research & federal duties: “place. There are thousands upon thousands of research studies that show this poison is killing us. Also Electromagnetic Field”

Matched review of original text; attachments excluded. Review provenance

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I'm not sure why this exercise is even taking place. There are thousands upon thousands of research studies that show this poison is killing us. Also Electromagnetic Fields are defined as a “pollutant” by insurance companies and often require special coverage as a “pollutant” in policy enhancements Due to the high risk that electromagnetic (EMF) field exposure poses, most insurance companies do not cover electromagnetic fields and have very clear “electromagnetic field exclusions”