AI summary & topic connections
The engineering firm takes no position on RF health effects and calls attention to the lack of a standardized longitudinal record of measured environmental RF exposure and the requirements for usable data.
- Research & federal duties: “data. The central issue we raise is the absence of a standardized, longitudinal record of measured radiofrequency environmental conditions in the ”
- Exposure limits & oversight: “No. HHS-OASH-2026-0397. Waterford is a radiofrequency engineering and compliance firm. For more than twenty years our principal business has been”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Waterford Consultants, LLC submits the attached comments in response to the Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields, Radiofrequency Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure, Docket No. HHS-OASH-2026-0397.
Waterford is a radiofrequency engineering and compliance firm. For more than twenty years our principal business has been the practical measurement and assessment of radiofrequency exposure in the field, and we also develop engineering software used across the industry for predictive exposure assessments. We take no position on the health effects of radiofrequency exposure.
Our comments address the availability and quality of exposure data. The central issue we raise is the absence of a standardized, longitudinal record of measured radiofrequency environmental conditions in the United States, what such a record must carry to be scientifically usable, and three recommended actions. The attached document addresses questions 2, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
Contact: regulatory@waterfordconsultants.com, telephone (703) 596-1022, extension 140.
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.