AI summary & topic connections
The commenter attributes a daughter's hospitalization to an RF meter and describes monitoring household exposure while questioning safety testing and research independence.
- Children & vulnerable groups: “I live in Spearfish, SD. My daughter was hospitalized with a rare blood condition we believe was from”
- Smart meters: “ rare blood condition we believe was from an RF meter installed above her room. We've also been having other symptoms of RF exp”
- Research & federal duties: “chnology, which has not undergone a suitable safety test, since Motorola was caught red handed polluting the efficacy of ”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I live in Spearfish, SD. My daughter was hospitalized with a rare blood condition we believe was from an RF meter installed above her room. We've also been having other symptoms of RF exposure, and we use wireless very sparingly while constantly monitoring RF in our home. We are cataloging RF readings in our home since this RF technology, which has not undergone a suitable safety test, since Motorola was caught red handed polluting the efficacy of the research (Dr. George Carlo), since the Navy in the 70's first identified the dangers, and since we want to have some correlating data when we start having strange health conditions associated with this haphazard rollout. It's dangerous tech. Nobody truly don't understands it, yet. My RF sensor is a "SAFETY METER". What the hell are we doing allowing it in our homes, schools, and into our lives from outside?
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.