Describes a family member's diagnosed EMR syndrome and volunteer surveying, reports displacement and isol…

I had a professional career specialising in creating benign living environments without harmful modern interventions. Choice of technology became key to avoiding adverse stimulus for the occupants in the interest of the least overall toxic load within habitable indoor spaces. These long term career interests suddenly and unexpectedly experienced a further stage of amplification when a family member developed severe electromagnetic radiation syndrome (EMR-S) over 14 years ago. This was formally diagnosed by a registered specialist medical doctor. My household had to learn how to manage and mitigate the adverse effects and symptoms arising from exposure to ubiquitous ambient emissions from pervasive anthropogenic environmental toxin known diversely as high wireless frequency microwave radiation or non-thermal, non-ionising radiation. This required cold, hard scrutiny and non-stop research and cross-referencing of evidence which was not captured agency generated, or industry aligned. Thus began a knowledge specialisation which has continued to this day, with ongoing further development, to include a full study of the German Building Biology Institute’s course. For more than a decade I have carried out RFR surveying, on a voluntary basis, assisting those affected by this same syndrome. Interestingly, approximately 90% of respondents are female; being perceptively aware, open-minded and well-grounded individuals. When not subjected to prolonged or concentrated RFR exposure causing symptoms which turn a fight /flight response into an inability to think straight, these same people are cogent, analytical thinkers. I have met all manner of people whose lives have been fundamentally destabilised by becoming EMR-S, whether being forced to lose their jobs, livelihood, savings and homes as a result of needing to search for a less EMR stimulating environmental. This has, in turn caused estrangement from friends, family and support networks as they become outcasts because their judgement, sanity or credibility is placed under ‘consensus view’ dismissal. This story leads inevitably to a hermit-like existence for the most EMR-S. Sadly, those most severely affected even contemplate ending their lives, if they can find no relief from the complex and ubiquitous overlay of multi-source RFR in our modern ambient environment. I have known two people to end their lives by hanging as a result of this level of despair. I have encountered all of the most common symptoms listed in the independent, non-industry compromised research studies, papers and volumes already produced on the subject of RFR and EMR-S. I have encountered less common symptoms and biological effects, to include streaming sinus reactions proximal to an on-call smart phone. I have even experienced, in real time, the ability of certain pharmaceutical blood pressure medications, which works by acting as calcium channel blockers to the blood / brain barrier actually reducing EMR-S symptoms in the person taking those same medications. None of the people I try to help have known each other yet all of their EMR-S related stories and adverse issues share common themes to the extent of overlapping heavily, or being almost the same in every detail, to include triggers, symptom delay, duration, power density, frequency combination or stimulus. The mast cell activation / inflammation pathway presentation from EMR stimulus is often evident. None of the people I try to help have anything to gain by amplification or distortion of the facts as they are presented: their lives are far too deeply impacted in existential ways for that to be a risk. There is now overwhelming evidence of the harm and potential for harm to all if you know how to connect the dots, interrogate and see through the narratives. One of the most respected researchers co-authored a paper which I post here. It demonstrates that the continuous deliberate attempts by industry to push the non-thermal / lack of adverse energy doctrine to claim the inability of RFR to harm is ill-founded and disingenuous. Bio-chemical cascades in living biological systems provide the explanation which the projected consensus narrative will not admit or give the oxygen of credibility. As if to underline this, a study by the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) group, Unit 1296 confirmed biological mechanisms which demonstrated that those with EMR-S do not suffer from psychosomatic issues: https://lagedefaire-lejournal.fr/electrosensibilite-une-realite-biologique-enfin-demontree/ For now, safe ‘white’ zones are for the EMR-S whilst the industry influence is neutered, scrutiny and prescription of safety should return to the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) in order properly to interrogate the fallacy of no harm and the lack of the precautionary principal. If this does not happen successive wireless technology will be likely to make us all EMR-S.