AI summary & topic connections

The commenter proposes 500-meter tower setbacks, fewer school routers and healthier lighting, and asks for action on dirty electricity, magnetic fields and ground currents.

  • Towers & siting: “tals, neighborhoods. I say that distance is 500 meters, but right now I believe there is no minimum distance. Wireless”
  • Wi-Fi & indoor exposure: “now I believe there is no minimum distance. Wireless routers should be limited to as few as necessary in schools. There is too much incentiviz”
  • Power lines, wiring & solar: “wire spacing, in our neighborhoods. Lastly, ground currents are a huge problem with out grid. Electricity comes to the home”
  • Children & vulnerable groups: “ould have to be a minimum distance away from schools, hospitals, neighborhoods. I say that distance is 500 meters, but right no”
  • Neurological symptoms & sleep: “ it is know to causes health issues, such as tinnitus, ringing in the ears. Almost everyone today suffers from some degree of tinnitus. A”
  • Environmental effects: “rrents. This is an established problem with animals on farms, most notably dairy farms. It is having an effect on people too”
  • Other concerns: “ve health consequences. We should look into healthier light sources such as incandescent and halogen. The lighting should be full s”

Matched review of original text; attachments excluded. Review provenance

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
There are many things that need to be addressed. Cell towers should have to be a minimum distance away from schools, hospitals, neighborhoods. I say that distance is 500 meters, but right now I believe there is no minimum distance. Wireless routers should be limited to as few as necessary in schools. There is too much incentivizing the proliferation of wireless tech in schools. Light is also an EMF and therefore should be considered in this too. There's an abundance of research on healthier artificial light sources. Unfortunately, healthy light spectrum doesn't line up with energy efficiency. The energy efficiency of LEDs has been oversold and the light spectrum of LEDs has negative health consequences. We should look into healthier light sources such as incandescent and halogen. The lighting should be full spectrum and have low or no level of flicker. Fluorescent lights should be banned altogether. There are studies that show that the spectrum of light produced by most fluorescents makes ADD worse. Well, that's the lighting in every school. And LED isn't much better. Lastly, the state of our electrical grid should be taken into consideration for a few different reasons. The amount of harmonic distortion or transient distortion, better known as "dirty electricity", is a huge and increasing problem on our grid and it is know to causes health issues, such as tinnitus, ringing in the ears. Almost everyone today suffers from some degree of tinnitus. Another problem is high magnetic fields, from things such as unbalanced loads and wire spacing, in our neighborhoods. Lastly, ground currents are a huge problem with out grid. Electricity comes to the home from the power station on the "hot" line and electricity is supposed to go back, in the form of current, on the "neutral". Most of our electricity doesn't go back on the neutral, instead it goes back on the earth in the form of ground currents. This is an established problem with animals on farms, most notably dairy farms. It is having an effect on people too. There are many experts in this area. Our electric is put up and in the ground and maintained by a bunch of sub-contracted "cowboys". They are paid to put it in the ground or in the air by the foot and their M.O. is to get it done as quick as possible. I know industry rules, but maybe practices can be changed that don't hinder progress too much. There are well established experts on all of these topics. If nothing gets done regarding any of these issues, it will only serve to further erode the trust of government in the eyes of the people. The people deserve a quick resolution to a lot of these issues and more.