AI summary & topic connections
Urges review of cited long-term animal studies, updated public information and safer tower placement, questioning the adequacy of FCC limits.
- Research & federal duties: “Please look at the low dose EMF rat studies (continuous low dose EMF's, like what humans are exposed to, ove”
- Exposure limits & oversight: “udies that show negative effects from EMF's. Last exposure limits update with the FCC regulations, were done in 1996! Get the information”
- Towers & siting: “ public so we can protect ourselves and have cell towers and antennae placed smartly and safely! Thank you for your time.”
- Heart symptoms & implanted devices: “terious results to the cornea, testicles and heart were evident in the rats. The FCC only used hours long, high dos”
- Reproduction & pregnancy: “ a human! Deleterious results to the cornea, testicles and heart were evident in the rats. The FCC only used hours long”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Please look at the low dose EMF rat studies (continuous low dose EMF's, like what humans are exposed to, over two years) that Dr. Paul Heroux carried out at McGill University in Canada. What happens in a rat, happens in a human! Deleterious results to the cornea, testicles and heart were evident in the rats. The FCC only used hours long, high doses of EMF's that caused burning, but never published studies with low dose EMF's done over months or years. Don't ignore the studies that show negative effects from EMF's. Last exposure limits update with the FCC regulations, were done in 1996! Get the information out to the public so we can protect ourselves and have cell towers and antennae placed smartly and safely! Thank you for your time.
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.