AI summary & topic connections
Attributes health changes to a Tesla vehicle, requests consumer warnings and recourse, objects to smart-meter fees and mandates, and discusses calcium-channel mechanisms and children's exposure.
- Exposure limits & oversight: “the equivalent of microwave radiation and no consumer warning is provided. Another area of concern, electric companies charg”
- Smart meters: “es charge consumers, such as FPL, a cost for opting out of smart meters and placing an undue financial burden on customers who choose to”
- Children & vulnerable groups: “k to the original color. Tesla is subjecting young children and pregnant mothers with the equivalent of microwave radiation and no consumer warni”
- Proposed biological mechanisms: “to emf poisioning. EMF radiation opens the voltage-gated channels of the cell to allow calcium to pour in. This country needs to ”
- Other concerns: “ical effects due to long-term exposure to my Tesla Model Y 2022. I am highly concerned and angered by the fact that Tesla i”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
According to the National Institute of Health, there are severe, adverse, long-term biological effects with exposure to non-native EMF's. “The Invisible Rainbow” by Arthur Firstenburg also details, to a great extent, the exposures that other portions of the world (Germany, Asia, etc.) have already, under scientific study, diagnosed physiological effects as neurasthenia. I have had adverse biological effects due to long-term exposure to my Tesla Model Y 2022. I am highly concerned and angered by the fact that Tesla is allowed to -not inform customers of the hazardous effects their vehicles have on human life -subject people to high amounts of EMF radiation/poisoning -no recourse is present for customers whom have purchased it and later learned that health conditions they have developed are directly due to exposure -or, not allowed Tesla owners to rescind lease agreements and place the burden on Tesla for the purchase of the vehicle, after finding out after purchase the hazardous, biological affects of the vehicle. Non-native EMF's, such as those poured out like a mobile microwave that a Tesla is, directly affect human bodies and can be measured by a Geiger Counter. The magnetism count for the Tesla vehicle when utilizing the Geiger Counter is off the charts, and I spent the first two years (myself and my daughter) charging inside this vehicle and being exposed to high-concentrated amounts of radiation in the driver seat, in any seat as there are wi-fi/electrical sensors in the seating, the middle console, the battery itself, the steering wheel. What’s more, is any cell towers in nearby areas ping and increase the radiation exposure to an individual. I have healthy blood panel readings, but have observed the hair in my genital areas turning gray, and no other areas on my body graying. The hair on my head is not gray. I sit in my vehicle for long periods of time. Over the summer when I did not drive as much, it turned back to the original color. Tesla is subjecting young children and pregnant mothers with the equivalent of microwave radiation and no consumer warning is provided.
Another area of concern, electric companies charge consumers, such as FPL, a cost for opting out of smart meters and placing an undue financial burden on customers who choose to opt into a healthier option.
Similarly, local cities such as the City of Daytona Beach forces customers to change their standard meter to a smart meter, which gets pinged at the Giga.hertz level and affects biological health in the area and unstructures the water. I made several requests to opt out and was told I wasn’t allowed to. This is a deep concern for homeowners that local governments will not provide alternative options for limiting their exposure to emf poisioning.
EMF radiation opens the voltage-gated channels of the cell to allow calcium to pour in.
This country needs to implement significant updates to the general policies and understanding of citizens to also include medical doctor’s. For example, my daughter’s dental office forces me to sign paperwork that indicates language, “Refusal of Diagnostic Dental Radiographs…” and states that I am subjecting my child to potential diseases by refusing X-ray exposure. Children with developing brains/bodies are more susceptible to the hazardous effects of emf radiation, and for doctor’s to indicate refusing consistent x-rays is hazardous to their health is absurd.
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.