Proposes that polarization makes human-made EMFs more biologically active through interference and ion-ch…

All types of man-made EMFs/EMR – in contrast to natural EMFs/EMR – are polarized. Polarized EMFs/EMR can have increased biological activity, due to 1) Ability to produce constructive interference effects and amplify their intensities at many locations. 2) Ability to force all charged/polar molecules and especially free ions within and around all living cells to oscillate on parallel planes and in phase with the applied polarized field. Such ionic forced-oscillations exert additive electrostatic forces on the sensors of cell membrane electro-sensitive ion channels, resulting in their irregular gating and consequent disruption of the cell’s electrochemical balance. These features render man-made EMFs/EMR more bioactive than natural non-ionizing EMFs/EMR. This explains the increasing number of biological effects discovered during the past few decades to be induced by man-made EMFs, in contrast to natural EMFs. Scientific Literature: -The fetal stage of life is the most vulnerable to any toxic exposure. Kaiser researcher Dr. De-Kun Li (2017) performed a robust prospective cohort study of over 900 pregnant women revealing the strong association between exposure to non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation from a variety of sources and miscarriage with nearly a 3 fold increase risk. This study supports and strengthens prior research. He states, “This study provides fresh evidence, directly from a human population, that MF non-ionizing radiation could have adverse biological impacts on human health.” -Relationship between the Exposure to Magnetic Fields during Pregnancy and Risk of Abortion: A Review Article. (2020) Ebadi A et al.INT J PEDIATRICS. Vol 8, August 2020. http://ijp.mums.ac.ir/article_16183.html -Association Between Maternal Exposure to Magnetic Field Nonionizing Radiation During Pregnancy and Risk of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Offspring in a Longitudinal Birth Cohort.(2020) Li DK et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(3):e201417. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2763232?guestAccessKey=cda77a0a-bfb6-4f74-99e0-0bdd2909bdb2&utm_source=silverchair&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=article_alert-jamanetworkopen&utm_term=mostread&utm_content=olf-widget_03302020 -Risk of congenital heart disease due to exposure to common electrical appliances during early pregnancy: a case-control study. (2020) Zhao D et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Sep 19. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32949363/ -Mother’s Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields before and during Pregnancy is Associated with Risk of Speech Problems in Offspring. (2019) Zarei, S., et al. Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering 9(1):61-68 (2019). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881935 -Maternal cell phone use during pregnancy and child behavior problems in five birth cohorts. (2017) International Society for Environmental Epidemiology. 2017. https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/isee/2016-o-021-4271/ -Exposure to Magnetic Field Non-Ionizing Radiation and the Risk of Miscarriage: A Prospective Cohort Study. (2017) Li et al. Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 13;7(1):17541. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5727515/ -Association between electromagnetic field exposure and abortion in pregnant women living in Tehran. (2016) Abad M et al. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2016 May; 14(5): 347–354. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4910032 -Oxidative stress of brain and liver is increased by Wi-Fi (2.45GHz) exposureal.J Chem Neuroanat. 2015 Oct 28. pii: S0891-0618(15)00074-5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26520617 -Maternal cell phone and cordless phone use during pregnancy and behaviour problems in 5-year-old children. Guxens M et al. (2013) J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 May;67(5):432-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23386674 -Maternal exposure to magnetic fields during pregnancy in relation to the risk of asthma in offspring. (2011) Li DK1, Chen H, Odouli R. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.2011 Oct;165(10):945-50. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21810627 -A nested case-control study of residential and personal magnetic field measures and miscarriages. (2002) Lee GM et al. 2002 Jan;13(1):21-31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11805582 -A population-based prospective cohort study of personal exposure to magnetic fields during pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage. (2002) Li DK et al. Epidemiology. 2002 Jan;13(1):9-20. -Critical periods of vulnerability for the developing nervous system: evidence from humans and animal models. Deborah Rice , Stan Barone. (2000) Environ Health Perspect 108(suppl 3):511–533 (2000). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.281.957 -Neuronal Death and Oxidative Stress in the Developing Brain. Chrysanthy Ikonomidou. (2011) Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. April 2011, Vol. 14, No. 8: 1535-1550. http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/ars.2010.3581