AI summary & topic connections
Expresses support for people reporting wireless effects and asks HHS to evaluate experiences and evidence and set research priorities for children and vulnerable groups.
- Research & federal duties: “ther potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for p”
- Children & vulnerable groups: “rrent research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.
I am responding from the perspective of a parent and concerned member of the public.
I support people affected by wireless radiation and think it is possible that far more people are affected by wireless radiation than we know of right now, and I believe HHS should address this issue.
I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.
I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.
Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.