The commenter supports people reporting wireless-radiation harms and urges HHS research and protective ac…

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a very concerned member of the public. Whole I am not aware of how wireless radiation has affected me, I now people who have been and are adversely affected by it, as people have different sensitivities. But while I or others are not consciously aware of the effects of wireless radiation, I know that its impact on human, flora and fauna health is present. Those who actually feel its negative effects suffer in the here and now, while others do over a longer period because the exposure is constant and ultimately pernicious. HHS stands for "Human and Health Services"; since wireless radiation damages human health, HHS should be on top of this radiation right now and forever, protecting health instead of ignoring it and protecting "special interests" and those who promote irresponsible wireless radiation exposure. So I strongly support HHS taking an active role in sincerely examining the health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. These are very real effects, not alleged or potential effects. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being adversely impacted should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.