AI summary & topic connections
The commenter worries about a college student sleeping beneath a router, requests access to low-exposure spaces and stronger limits, and supports HHS research; template language remains.
- Wi-Fi & indoor exposure: “just started college and he sleeps in a bunk directly under a wifi router. This cannot be good for his health, especially since he is on a”
- Housing, work & access barriers: “riod of time where he is allowed to be in an EMF free zone for at least when he is sleeping. Why are we not concerned about”
- Exposure limits & oversight: “ of the citizens of our country? Why are our wireless radiation limits so much higher than the rest of the world? Please do your job an”
- Children & vulnerable groups: “some becuase we cannot protect ourselves. My son just started college and he sleeps in a bunk directly under a wifi router. This canno”
- Research & federal duties: “ther potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for p”
- Unfilled template text: “. I am responding from the perspective of a [patient, parent, family member, caregiver, healthcare professional, researcher, ”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.
I am responding from the perspective of a [patient, parent, family member, caregiver, healthcare professional, researcher, advocate, concerned member of the public, or other].
Wireless radiation is unexcapable which is troublesome becuase we cannot protect ourselves. My son just started college and he sleeps in a bunk directly under a wifi router. This cannot be good for his health, especially since he is on a laptop,phone, etc, all day and in buildings with contnuous wifi. There has to be a period of time where he is allowed to be in an EMF free zone for at least when he is sleeping. Why are we not concerned about the health and well being of the citizens of our country? Why are our wireless radiation limits so much higher than the rest of the world? Please do your job and establish healhy regs around this topic.
I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.
I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.
Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.