AI summary & topic connections

The commenter argues that decades-old federal guidelines have not kept pace with wireless expansion and research and urges updated protections for children.

  • Exposure limits & oversight: “work, learn, and raise our children. Yet the federal guidelines used to determine the safety limits for exposure to wireless rad”
  • Children & vulnerable groups: “ffects on human health and the environment. Our children deserve better. They deserve to grow up in an environment where their health a”
  • Research & federal duties: “where technology is supported by meaningful, up-to-date science—not assumptions based on outdated guidelines.  Please act. Thi”

Matched review of original text; attachments excluded. Review provenance

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
It’s time to do the right thing. I wouldn’t want to face God one day knowing I have hurt many of my brothers and sisters because I did nothing. That guilt will be on you. Over the past several decades, wireless technology and infrastructure have exploded, transforming the environment in which we live, work, learn, and raise our children. Yet the federal guidelines used to determine the safety limits for exposure to wireless radiation are decades old and have not kept pace with the rapid expansion of wireless technology or the growing body of scientific research raising concerns about its effects on human health and the environment. Our children deserve better. They deserve to grow up in an environment where their health and safety are prioritized and where technology is supported by meaningful, up-to-date science—not assumptions based on outdated guidelines.  Please act. This needs to be remedied. Regards, Sheila Salce May God be with you +++